x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Back Issues  
 
news details
Seeking reasons from officials out of RTI ambit: SIC
2/12/2016 11:53:56 PM
Early Times Report

Jammu, Feb 12: The State Information Commission (SIC) in its order has said that asking reasons from officials under Right to Information Act (RTI) is not an information which could be sought under this law. The commission gave this order while disposing off an appeal titled Nazir Ahmad V/S SDM Vijaypur, Tehsildar Bari Bharamana. The information seeker wanted to know the reasons about a land mutation, and that was denied by the tehsildar and the SDM. The SIC has upheld the orders of the Tehsildar who is also the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the concerned tehsil office.
Details available with Early Times reveal that one Nazir Ahmed, S/o Siraj Din, a resident of Greater Kailash, Jammu filed second appeal before the State Information Commission (SIC) on 13.11.2015 stating that he filed an application under RTI Act to get some details about an alleged illegal mutation of land in the Bari Bharamana tehsil. The application was sent through registered speed-post on 11.09.2015 before PIO/Tehsildar, Bari Brahmana, District: Samba, but the concerned PIO failed to give response within the stipulated period.
Thereafter, the appellant filed First Appeal before the First Appellate Authority (FAA)/SDM, Vijaypur on 20.10.2015. That during hearing before FAA (SDM) on 04.11.2015, PIO submitted reply dated: 31.10.2015. That PIO forwarded the reply of Patwari written in "Urdu", whereas as reply should have been in English as RTI application was drafted in english . Being aggrieved by the reply of PIO and FAA , Nazir Ahmad filed second appeal before the State Information Commission (SIC).
During course of proceedings held at SIC on 12.1.2016 , the RTI application of the information seeker was discussed threadbare by the commission. It was found that S.No. 1 & 2 of the RTI application are statements made by the information seeker and he has not sought any information on these two points. As regards point 3, Tehsildar in his reply vide No. TBB/OQ/2015- 16/35/Reply/RTI dated: 31.10.2015 has stated that vide mutation No. 118(Jeem) Khasra No. 300,12 Marlas "Mera Doyam" land has been mutated in favour of one Daljit Singh, S/o. Rubail Singh. The information seeker sought reasons for transfer of this land out of 17 Marlas?
"As per definition of information as contained in section 2(d) of the Act, giving reasons or justifications, is outside the scope of the definition of "information". For this the appellant shall have to approach the appropriate competent authority" reads SIC order.
Response to para 4 has been given and again information seeker has sought reasons which is not covered under the definition of information as per SIC order . At point 5, the information seeker has sought the name of Patwari, who has changed the type of land. This has been responded by the Tehsildar stating that no such record is available in Patwar khana, which will indicate the name of the concerned Patwari.
Tehsildar (PIO) however, stated that mutation No. 118(Jeem) has been authenticated on 08.02.2009. Thus information as per records has been furnished. At points 6 and 7 also, the appellant has sought names of Patwari, Girdawar and Naib-Tehsildar who entered, verified and attested the Fard/Inteqal. This has been responded to by the PIO/Tehsildar, Bari Brahmana, by stating that no such records are available and on the basis of signatures on the documents it is not possible as to who has signed it, as they have not indicated their names.
SIC's order further reads: "This plea of respondent is upheld. FAA/SDM, Vijaypur and PIO/Tehsildar, Bari Brahmana further submitted that recently the system of indicating name against the signatures is adopted strictly, as per which, all the officers of the Revenue Department are required to indicate their names. As evidence thereof, respondents referred to revenue documents enclosed with the information, wherein the Patwari has indicated his name against the signatures. From the perusal of the information provided vis a vis information sought, the Commission is of the considered view that Tehsildar has responded to all the points of the RTI application on the basis of records. As regards the grievances of the appellant, he was informed that it is outside the scope of the J&K RTI Act, 2009 and for redressal of grievances/complaints, he is advised to approach the concerned competent authority. Further, PIO/Tehsildar, Bari Brahmana is directed to attest the documents provided to the appellant. With the above directions, the appeal filed before the Commission is disposed of".
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU