x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Back Issues  
 
news details
COMMON MAN'S JUDICIOUS KNOWLEDGE
4/29/2016 10:58:43 PM
Mahadeep Singh Jamwal

India has the oldest judiciary in the world.
In Ancient times in the villages, the local village councils, similar to modern Panchayats, consisted of a board of five or more member to dispense justice to the villagers. At higher level in towns and districts the Courts were presided over by the government officer, under the authority of king to administer the justice. According to 'Brihaspati Smiriti', there was a hierarchy of Courts in Ancient India, beginning with the family Courts and ending with the King. The lowest was the family arbitrator. The next higher Court was that of Judge; the next of the Chief Justice called 'Adhyaksha' and at the top was the King's Court. The jurisdiction of each was determined by the importance of the dispute. It is found that even jury system existed in Manu's period.
Speaking of the modern era, we find that 'The Indian High Court's Act of 1861' was enacted by the Parliament of the United Kingdom to authorize the Crown to create High Courts in the Indian Colony. Queen Victoria created the High Courts in Calcutta, Madras and Bombay and abolished the Supreme Courts at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay. These High Courts had the distinction of being the highest Courts for all cases till the creation of Federal Court of India, under the Government of India Act 1935. The Federal Court had jurisdiction to solve disputes between provinces and Federal States and hear appeal against judgments of the High Courts. The Supreme Court of India came into being on 28 January 1950 and it replaced both the Federal Court of India and the judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which were then at the apex of the Indian Court System.
The Indian Judiciary administers a common law course system of legal jurisdiction, in which customs, precedents and legislation, all codify the Law of Land. They form a strict hierarchy of importance with Supreme Court of India at the top, followed by High Courts of respective States and so on, to the level of junior division Judicial Officers at the bottom. The Judiciary is independent of the Executive and Legislative branches of Government. According to the Constitution of India the Supreme Court is a Federal Court, guardian of the Constitution and the highest Court of Appeal. The Judiciary interprets the Constitution as its final arbiter. The appointment of a Judge is effected by President of India from a list of names recommended by the 'Collegiums', a closed group of the chief justice of India and the most senior Judges of the Supreme Court for appointments to the Supreme Court, and they, together with the Chief Justice of a High Court and its senior most Judges, for appointments to that Court. The existing system of appointing Supreme Court Judges was attempted by the present government to be replaced by enacting 'National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 and the Constitution Act (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act 2014. Apparently, it was a move of the Government to have its participation in appointment of Judges, a politically motivated step. It was passed by the Parliament with ratification by 16 of the Sates Legislatures in India; mostly BJP ruled States and subsequently, assented by the President of India on 31 December 2014. The NJAC Act and the Constitutional Amendment Act came into force from 13 April 2015, but it was struck down by Constitutional Bench of Supreme Court on 16 October 2015 by 4; 1 majority as unconstitutional after hearing the petitions filed by several persons and bodies with Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association.
A very vital concern is with regard to the pendency of cases in various Courts of the country from Apex to the Lower Courts and in my opinion it is the reason of remarks of CJI, that the Judiciary is losing its credibility. There are various reasons attributed to the pendency in the courts but important of them are;
n The disposal of cases suffered as the process for appointment of Judges came to a stand still for almost a year, as to the tug of war over validity of NJAC.
n Due to approximately 43% vacancies in High Courts of the country even the SC too has a vacancy of five judges.
n There may be reason for backlog is a pile of false cases registered by interested parties to get a stay.
n As remarked by CJI, Bar was not very cooperative in disposing of cases. His remarks came during 150th anniversary function of Allahabad High Court. Lord Halifax, Britain's Secretary at the outbreak of Second World War says 'If the Laws could speak for themselves, they would complain of the Lawyers in the first place'.
The grave situation of pendency of cases was expected to be addressed in a visionary manner by PM of India in recently concluded 'Annual Chief Ministers and Chief Justices Conference' The Prime Minister Modi's comment on reducing annual holidays of Judges to help reduce pendency and further statement that he has attended the same conference several times and heard speeches several times as Gujarat CM. Speakers have kept his suggestions to reduce their annual holidays to help reduce pendency. This statement of PM sharply reacted by Chief Justice of India by saying that 'Do you mean we go to Manali (considered to be holiday home of PM) or some other hill station to enjoy ourselves. During the conference of Judges and CMs, Justice Thakur, who made an emotional appeal to Modi, in increasing the number of Judges to clear the national backlog, made a strong remark saying that Modi's "advice should be to bar". Chief Justice of India launched a scathing attack on government inaction, squarely blaming the centre for stalling appointment of Judges to the High Courts. He also blamed the Centre of doing nothing to increase the number of Courts and Judges in the country, thus denying the poor man and under trial prisoners their due of Justice. The Chief Justice asked what the point of 'Make in India' was and inviting foreign investments when investors are increasingly doubtful about the timely delivery of Justice. Strong worded comments to Centre that how long will you take to process these proposals? How long, when jails are over flowing. The brushing away of this suggestion of PM with heavy hammer by CJI needs to be taken as an awakening call for the Government and to proceed for the needful without further waste of time.
The CJI has shown his serious concern for pendency, while inaugurating the new building of the Lucknow Bench of the High Court and said 'while noting that people's aspiration for justice has increased', CJI on Sunday suggested hearing and finalization of cases during the summer holidays, if council of both the sides were willing. He assured the lawyers that if bar cooperate, Judges will be ready to sit on Saturdays to finish old matters.
The concept of 'Lok Adalat' is a system of alternate dispute resolution developed n India by Legal services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalats an informal, alternate mechanism has been a phenomenal success in tackling pendency, especially in pre-litigation matters, settling fresh cases before they become full-blown disputes and enter the courts. The move to reduce pendency, 'Fast-Track Courts', 'Evening Courts/Morning Courts' and concept of 'Mobile Courts' to bring Justice at the doorstep are matters of great concern. Some quotes comes to my mind as; (Martin Luther King, junior) 'Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.' (Mahatma Gandhi) 'There is higher Court than Courts of Justice and that is the Court of Conscience. It supersedes all other Courts'. The Laws on Earth are conceived and enacted by the human beings, so it can never be claimed that such Laws are always perfect, the Laws are enforced by human beings, its perfect enforcement cannot be claimed and similarly the Judgments are also delivered by human beings, so there is possibility of some lacunas in the Judgments, that is by the idiom goes that "Good Judgments come from experience and experience comes from bad Judgments". The healthy comments always brings betterment and chances to refine, so the remarks of Justice Ruma Pal, a Judge of Supreme Court of India from January 28, 2000 to June 3, 2006 and member of the International Forum of Women Judges, in November 2011 are a direction towards it. Justice Ruma Pal slammed the judiciary for what she called the seven sins. She listed the sins as:
1. Turning a blind eye to the injudicious conduct of a colleague.
2. Hypocrisy - the complete distortion of the norm of judicial independence.
3. Secrecy - the fact that no aspect of Judicial Conduct including the appointment of Judges to the High and Supreme Court is transparent.
4. Plagiarism - meaning that very often SC Judges lift whole passages from earlier decisions by their predecessors and do not acknowledge this - and use long-winded, verbose language.
5. Self Arrogance - wherein the Higher Judiciary has claimed crass superiority and independence to mask their own indiscipline and transgression of norms and procedures.
6. Professional arrogance - whereby Judges do not do their homework and arrive at decisions of grave importance ignoring precedent or Judicial Principle.
7. Nepotism - wherein favors are sought and dispensed by some Judges for gratification of varying manner.
Concluding, with the remarks of 'Atifete Jahjaga', who served as Deputy Director of Kosovo Police holding the rank of Major General and first female President of the Republic of Kosovo that "Democracy must be built through open societies that share information. When there is information, there is enlightenment. When there is debate, there are solutions. When there is no sharing of power, no rule of law, no accountability, there is abuse, corruption, subjugation and indignation".
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU