x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Bingo! Sajad's PC not invited by CEO to discuss Polls | For electoral politics, NC, PDP support anti-nationals in courts | District Level Mock Youth Parliament organized | J&K Police vanquish J&K Academy in tie breaker | DPS Nagbani holds Yoga Competition | FOB organizes Swachhta Action Plan at Kalakote | Bharti Foundation organizes workshops on counseling skills | JKSABBA to organize Body Building Championship | Ration for APL, but not for BPL families as TSO Kishtwar embezzles 2500 Quintals of BPL ration | Lab Technician denies receiving money for carrying out investigations | Center to build World's largest Solar Energy Power Plant in Jammu and Kashmir | Chowdary Ghulam Hassan joins Manvadhikar National Party | Nagar Kirtan taken out at Vijaypur | CTA discusses issues regarding filling up posts of APs | Congress leader conducts tour of Billawar constituency | Horticulture Department to organize Divisional Level mega event | NSS Unit, SMVDU Temporary deployment at SMVD Shrine Board | Non-Gazetted Forest official association held protest over pending demands | Union, state governments yet to act on 1987 SC suggestions | Clueless BJP says 'it never compromised on core issues' | PDP 'rebel' likely to join NC | Class XII topper dropped under SAARC quota | Kumar listen to people's issues at Jammu | FD official `takes' money for posting of Inspectors, SIs | Palm Island Mall in soup | Projected as 'savior', Talib Husain turned out to be a criminal | Govt discriminating against Jammu in Sports | Nagri Town library in a shambles | ReT regularization against regular posts irks teachers | Jat Biradari delegation call on Chairman Commission for Backward classes | Ombudsmen MGNREGA seeks details of purchased TV sets | `SA in ZEO Thatri forges service books' | State tax team raids defaulters | Civilian injured in Pak firing along LoC | Tehsildar booked for causing loss to state exchequer | Govt orders transfers, new postings in administration | Army 'celebrates' terror crackdown but Omar Abdullah 'begs to differ' | Petitioner not to be replaced by any other contractual appointee: HC | Minimum temperatures rise in most parts of Kashmir | HC asks police not to issue appointment orders to 482 SIs, seeking entire selection record | Court initiates proceedings against prosecutrix for perjury | 3 Policemen injured after terrorists lobbed grenade on security forces | Khair growing farmers exploited by Forest Deptt-Industrialists nexus: Harsh | JKECA alleges fraud from EMC limited | Safai Karamcharis protest in front of Municipal office Jourian | Political initiatives and military operations must go together | For Shah Faesal it is time to smell the coffee | Social justice for weaker section | Restore human values and prevent violence against women | Back Issues  
 
news details
Perverse order cannot fall within definition PC Act: HC
4/15/2018 10:41:33 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, Apr 15: While quashing FIR registered by the Vigilance in 1986, Justice M K Hanjura of High Court after hearing Advovate Abhinav Sharma appearing for the then Assistant Custodian Jammu (Former MLC PDP) Asgar Ali, observed that wrong/incorrect or even an illegal or perverse order cannot fall within the definition of an offence under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act merely because some procedural irregularities are noticed by the court.
The judge observed that no finality is attached to an order passed by the Assistant Custodian. It can be challenged before the authority designated under the Act as has been done in the instant case. The power to be exercised by the Assistant Custodian is a power vested with him under a statute and under the colour of his office he exercises the power of a civil court.
"Therefore, the action of the petitioner in passing an order under Section 8 of the Act would not fall within the purview of Section 5(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. An order passed by the civil court which is bad or perverse would not per-se mean that its maker can be prosecuted under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In such a case the scheme as provided and postulated under the Act has to be followed by the aggrieved person," the judge observed.
According to the case petitioner Asgar Ali then Assistant Custodian Jammu former MLC PDP sought quashing of FIR submitting that one Abdul Majid S/o Abdul Aziz R/o Chak Mohammad Yar tehsil R S Pura, Jammu filed an application under Section 8 of the Evacuees' (Administration of Property) Act, 2006, (for brevity known as "The Act") on 20.02.1981 before the then Tehsildar (Assistant Custodian), Jammu namely, Mohammad Aslam, seeking restoration of the land situate at village Deeli, Tehsil Jammu, comprising Survey Nos.285, 286/1, 287 and 372 measuring 47 Kanals 14 Marlas and under KhasraNo.283, 284, 286/2 and 373 measuring 47 Kanals 4 Marlas belonging to one Allah Ditta S/o Noor Mohd and Karamfllahi S/o Fazal Din, on the ground that he is their sole heir.
Since the application was filed after a period of 35 years approximately from the date, the evacuees had left the place, therefore, the Assistant Custodian made an endorsement on the said application to that effect. However, the then Custodian proceeded ahead in the said application and issued a notice inviting objections from the general public which was published in a newspaper and, thereafter, the Court recorded the statements of the witnesses produced by the applicant in support of his application seeking restoration of the land. The said application came to be dismissed for non-prosecution and was consigned to records.
Subsequently, the same was restored to its original number by the then Custodian namely Meharban Singh posted as Tehsildar, Agrarian Reforms, Jammu, at that moment. In 1983, the petitioner came to be posted as Tehsildar (Assistant Custodian) Jammu, and the said application was ripe for final determination at that juncture. The petitioner decided the said application vide order dated 25.11.1983 which directed that the land be restored in favour of the applicant namely, Abdul Majid, inasmuch as no one else had opposed the said application or laid any claim over the said property. The petitioner passed the said order on the basis of the material available on the record.
However, the police authorities of Police Station Vigilance Organization, Jammu registered an FIR bearing No.9 of the year 1986 for the commission of an offence under Section 5(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act alleging therein that the petitioner had hatched a criminal conspiracy with the applicant namely, Abdul Majid, despite the fact that at a time when the application under Section 8 was filed, the petitioner was posted at Poonch and not in Jammu. The FIR was registered against the petitioner, the then Assistant Custodian-Mohammad Aslam Qureshi and the applicant namely, Abdul Majid. It is further contended that the order passed by the petitioner in the application of Abdul Majid was challenged by one Siraj-ud-Din before the Custodian General, J&K Government in a revision petition and during the pendency of the revision petition, the petitioner Siraj-ud-Din died and his daughter namely Sharifa Bibi was brought on record as his legal heir.
However, fate had it for her that she too died during the pendency of the revision petition and despite that the Custodian General allowed the revision petition and quashed the order dated 25.11.1983 vide his judgment dated 23.04.2008. Abdul Majid preferred a revision before the Special Tribunal, Jammu in which he challenged the vires of the order dated 23.04.2008 of the Custodian General and the Special Tribunal Jammu stayed the operation of the order passed by the Custodian General. The petitioner has proceeded to state that the respondent No.2 contemplates to produce the challan against the petitioner and Abdul Majid as well and Mohd. Aslam has been dropped from the list of the accused.
Justice Hanjura after hearing Adv Abhinav Sharma appearing for the petitioner whereas Deputy AG Raman Sharma appearing for the VOJ observed that The power to be exercised by the Assistant Custodian is a power vested with him under a statute and under the colour of his office he exercises the power of a civil court. Therefore, the action of the petitioner in passing an order under Section 8 of the Act would not fall within the purview of Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. An order passed by the civil court which is bad or perverse would not per-se mean that its maker can be prosecuted under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In such a case the scheme as provided and postulated under the Act has to be followed by the aggrieved person. With these observations, High Court quashed FIR NO 9/1986 registered by the Vigilance Organization Jammu against the petitioner for an offence punishable under Section 5(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act is a sheer abuse of the process of law.
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU