x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Sajad Lone blames NC for bringing AFSPA to J&K | Surgery at private hospital sends patient to ventilator | Special Judge Bala Jyoti sends Patwari, chowkidar to 13 day judicial remand | Given political will, aerospace power can be used beyond enemy lines: IAF Chief | Money looted from poor in Bengal will be returned to them: PM Modi | Rajnath to address Army Commanders conference | Bird species on rise in J&K | ACB books MC officials | Blast in Poonch: 2 suspects detained | Kashmir braces up for wet spell | Missing Person traced out and reunited with family after 14 Years by Police Post Belicharna | Refresher Training course for AROs of District Anantnag held | BJP firm on AFSPA revocation, NC need not to raise fingers: Kavinder | Jammu Police felicitates vigilant citizen for installing CCTV , helping solve crime | Congress responsible for J&K turmoil: Rana | Dr Syed Darakhshan Andrabi initiates restoration efforts at historic Pather Masjid in Srinagar | IndiGo to double in size, fly to more global destinations by 2030: CEO | Envoys of 5 nations present credentials to President Murmu | Case against man for spreading rumour on social media in Pulwama: Police | Transporters in Jammu call one-day strike against operations of e-buses | 8 more candidates file nomination for Udhampur Lok Sabha seat | West Bengal resident among 3 drug peddlers arrested in Kashmir | NC will repeat 1977 victory against BJP, its subsidiary parties: Omar | "Our Import Dependencies Need To Be Near Zero": Army Chief lays thrust on self-reliance in military production | HC refuses to quash FIR in Insurance Scam | DB imposes costs Rs 20000/- for misleading Court with a view to get favorable order | DB holds courts cannot encourage appointments made outside constitutional scheme | DGP sanctions scholarships of over Rs 12.90 lakh in favour of 223 wards of police personnel | BSF seizes 2 drones near India-Pak border in Tarn Taran | Punjab | ED conducts raids in case linked to guava orchards compensation 'Scam' | J&K's Ex-Governor N N Vohra welcomes Shah's statement on troops withdrawal, AFSPA | Sadanand Vasant Date: 26/11 hero becomes new NIA chief | Natrang celebrates World Theatre Day with three day festival | SSP conducts introductory meeting with senior citizens to address community concerns | Police traces out missing youth, reunited with family | Two drug peddlers apprehended with 4.78 grms of heroin | RPFC leads "Nidhi Aapke Nikat 2.0" awareness drive at GDC Kathua | Civil Defence organises awareness programme | Cyberl Cell solves online financial fraud of Rs 50000 | Bovine smuggling attempts foiled, 08 bovines rescued in Tikri | Ramban police arrests 03 bovine smugglers | Vi Launches Vi Movies & TV: Ultimate entertainment App with Multi-Platform Access, Comprehensive Content Library | Missing person reunited with family by Kana Chak police efforts | Workshop on Saral Manak Sanskrit concluded by Cental Sanskrit University | GDC Kunjwani honors Shivaansh Kapoor | Aryabhatta Ganit Challenge 2023-24: Illuminating Mathematical Brilliance | Govt SPMR College of Commerce celebrates World Theatre Day | Government Degree College Kathua organizes expert talk | GDC Ramnagar organizes seven days' special winter camp | GDC Hiranagar hosts impact lecture and training program | GDC Dudu Basantgarh raises awareness on drug abuse | PM Shri Govt Higher Secondary School Bhalra empowers youth with SVEEP programme | Back Issues  
 
news details
HC dismisses JK Bank ex-chairman's plea challenging Chibber's appointment
11/11/2020 11:09:46 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, Nov 11: The Jammu and Kashmir High Court on Wednesday dismissed the plea of ex-chairman of Jammu and Kashmir Bank challenging the appointment of present chairman
Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey dismissed the petition of Parvez Ahmed Nengroo challenging the communication no.FD/Bkg/21/2019 dated 08.06.2019 addressed by the Additional Secretary to the Government, Finance Department of the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir, to the Company Secretary, J&K Bank Limited, conveying the decisions of the Government taken by it in exercise of the powers under Article 69(iii) of Articles of Association of the Bank, that the petitioner shall cease to be Director on the Board of Directors of the Bank and, consequently, be no longer the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Board of Directors of the Bank (the Board), and further about nominating R K Chibber, respondent no.4 herein, as Director on the Board and his appointment as the interim Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Board/Bank.
Justice Magrey observed that the stand so taken on behalf of the petitioner clinches the issue, in that it is, thus, admitted by the petitioner that with his nomination as Director on the Board of the Bank and his appointment as Chairman-cum-Chief Executive Officer, he is deemed to have retired from the said date, of course, according to him, for purpose of computing qualifying service for the purpose of pension. So, if the petitioner is deemed to have retired as an employee of the Bank with effect from 06.10.2016, the date he was nominated as the Government Director on the Board and appointed as Chairman of the Bank, the question is what would his relationship with the Bank be during the period he would remain or remained as nominated Director on the Board of the Bank and its Chairman-cum-Chief Executive Officer, especially so when, admittedly, this period is to be excluded while computing the qualifying service?
Justice Magrey further observed that the word 'retirement' means termination of one's employment or career; retirement may be voluntary or involuntary. Obviously, in the instant case, the petitioner had the choice to decline the nomination as Director on the Board and to be the Chairman and CEO of the Bank. But he accepted the position and thereby, by operation of the relevant Regulation(s), of his own volition agreed to be deemed to have retired from the employment of the Bank. He, thus, having seceded his relationship with the Bank as its employee, the period during which he remained as nominated Director on the Board and Chairman and CEO of the Bank would not constitute employment to be governed by the service conditions of the Bank. If that be so, as it actually is, the only relationship of the petitioner with the Bank while being a Government Director on the Board and Chairman/CEO of the Bank cannot but be contractual in nature.
The High Court further observed that despite the above clearly admitted position, the claim of the petitioner is that, nay, so far as he is concerned, his employment with the Bank continued unabated and uninterrupted. It is pleaded that the concept of deemed retirement has no relation with one's service and is even otherwise not applicable to Chairman/CEO and whole-time Directors who are serving employees of the Bank and had subsequent to their service in the Bank at a career level post been elevated to a Board Level Post in the same Bank. In other words, it is submitted that the definition of the expression "deemed to have retired" given in the Pension Regulations is not attracted in the case of Chairman/CEO and whole time Directors of the Bank. To buttress this submission, reliance is placed on one of the bulleted paragraphs of Clause 4 of the Compensation Policy of the Bank which specifies the components of compensation as could be provided by the Bank to its employees. Reference in this connection is also made to the resolution of the Board dated 27.12.2018 and approval dated 15.05.2019 thereto accorded by the RBI. In this regard, one thing has to be borne in mind that neither the position of Director, nor of the Chairman/CEO or the Managing Director are promotional posts in the service of the Bank. So, nomination of the petitioner as Government Director on the Board or his appointment as Chairman/CEO of the Board of the Bank is not an elevation in the sense of promotion as construed in ordinary service parlance. Now, before coming to Clause 4 of the Compensation Policy, the resolution of the Board dated 27.12.2018 and approval thereto dated 15.05.2019 accorded by the RBI, it may be mentioned here that pursuant to Articles 71 and 72 of the Articles of Association of the Bank, particularly clause (e) of Article 72, the Board of Directors has framed the service conditions, entitled the Pension Regulations. Rule/Regulation 2 thereof defines various terminologies used therein. It says 'in these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires'. Sub-rule (k) of these Regulations defines the expression 'Date of Retirement'.
Justice Magrey further observed that the nomination of the petitioner as Director on the Board and his appointment as Chairman-cum-Chief Executive Officer of the Bank was contractual in nature and not governed by any Statute or the service conditions ordinarily applicable to the employees of the Bank. In Chanda Deepak Kochhar v ICICI Bank Limited (supra), the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court has held that contractual duties are enforceable as matters of private law by ordinary contractual remedies such as damages, injunction, specific performance and declaration. It is also to be borne in mind that Mandamus is limited to enforcement of public duty. In that view of the matter, this petition, insofar as it challenges communication no.FD/Bkg/21/2019 dated 08.06.2019 addressed by the Additional Secretary to the Government, Finance Department, of the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir, to the Company Secretary, J&K Bank Limited, conveying the decisions of the Government taken by it in exercise of the powers under Article 69(iii) of Articles of Association of the Bank, that the petitioner shall cease to be Director on the Board of Directors of the Bank and, consequently, be no longer the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Bank, is held to be not maintainable. The remedy lies in the civil court.
Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey observed that the case of the petitioner before this Court is that even when he was nominated as Government Director on the Board and was appointed as Chairman-cum-Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, he continued to be in service of the Bank unabated and uninterrupted and, therefore, continued to be governed by the service conditions of the Bank, and that since the Bank, being an instrumentality of the State, is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court, this petition challenging communication dated 09.07.2019, which conveyed to him that he is deemed to have retired from the service of the Bank with effect from 06.10.2016, is maintainable. In that context, this Court has recorded its finding that in terms of Rule/Regulation 2(k) and 2(l) of the Pension Regulations, the petitioner is deemed to have retired from the Service of the Bank with effect from 06.10.2016, therefore, his tenure as being the Chairman & CEO of the Bank is not governed by the Service Rules of the Bank. Consequently, any dispute sought to be raised by him in relation thereto, including challenge to communication dated 09.07.2019, cannot be gone into by this Court in its writ jurisdiction. In that view, this writ petition to that extent as well is not maintainable.
The High Court further observed that since all the other reliefs prayed for by the petitioner in this petition are relatable to the two prayers for issue of the writs of Certiorari to quash the two communications dated 08.06.2019 and 09.07.2019, this petition for these reliefs as well would not survive before this Court in its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction.
Justice Magrey observed that so far as the prayer of the petitioner for a direction to the respondents for release of all perquisites and benefits due and payable to him in law is concerned, it is seen that Chapter II of the Pension Regulations contain and provide for the application and eligibility of the said Regulations. It is admitted that he was in the service of the Bank till 06.10.2016, the date he was deemed to have retired from the service of the Bank. This Court could make a direction that in the event he is eligible to pensionary benefits under the Pension Regulations in question in lieu of his service till 06.10.2016 and he applies in accordance therewith for grant of such pensionary benefits, the Bank authorities shall consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the applicable rules and pass appropriate orders, but, since this Court is dealing with the petition in limine and leaving the petitioner free to approach the civil court for seeking his main reliefs, such a direction may amount to treading into the merits of the case and may prejudice the petitioner in the civil court in seeking his all the reliefs. Therefore, by way of abundant caution no direction is made in that regard.
With these observation the High Court ordered that this petition is dismissed in limine along with all connected CMs as not maintainable before this Court, leaving the petitioner free to approach the civil court for seeking enforcement of his contractual relationship and/or redressal of his contractual dispute(s) with the Bank. This also disposes of the connected CMs.
—JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU