Like our Facebook Page

Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
Breaking News :   Power crises haunts Jammu, courtesy 200 MWs supply deficit | Tourist flow declines to lowest ebb post Article 370's abrogation | Detained Kashmir-centric leaders 'threat to peace' | J&K UT may have provision of 15-year residency for owning land | 66 DySPs reshuffled | Two separate committees set up for J&K investors' summit | FASTag comes into force from today, evokes mixed reaction from commuters | Shiv Sena leader Eknath Shinde schools Rahul Gandhi, says every Indian should respect Veer Savarkar | Govt open to pre-budget suggestions to revive economy | Bride drugs family, runs away with valuables | Strengthen intelligence mechanism to prevent another Kargil-like situation: Experts | CAIT urges Govt to take action against e-commerce firms flouting FDI policy | Regulation for vintage vehicles soon; number plates to display 'VA' | The winter challenge in Kashmir and role of the Indian Army | TIPS TO OVERCOME SELF-DOUBT #VitaminG | Role of Nehru in changing Indian society and politics | Rahul on fire | Ambulance taking patient to hospital stuck in traffic jam at Mendhar | Railway Minister pays obeisance at Vaishno Devi shrine | Tourists throng Panchari to enjoy fresh snowfall | Scientia International School celebrates Annual day | Natrang stages 'Khatarnak Ghar' and 'Jambu Nagri' | NYK Organises Block Level Sports Meet | Sainik School Nagrota organizes ex-students meet | SMVDU organises National Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematical Sciences | Model Academy Ranked No.1 in CBSE School category | Model Academy Ranked No.1 in CBSE School category | Punjabi Sahitik Sabha conducts Literary Meet | DC Poonch cancels illegal mutation of Forest land in favour of Ex-MLC | People up in arms against CAPD Deptt for shortage of K oil | Chenani-Patnitop circular roads open for traffic | Srinagar-Jammu highway, Mughal road remains closed | Severe cold grips J&K, Ladakh | Govt to start Drug De-addiction facilities in new Medical Colleges by Jan 2020 | Want that detained J-K leaders come out, resume political activity: Ram Madhav | Fire in Civil Secretariat Jammu | Tap water to all 2.5 lakh households before 1 March 2020: DC Srinagar | National Conference asks PM to start direct dialogue with people of J&K | Panun Kashmir welcomes CAB, says entire nation 'stands with PM' | Implementing FASTag reply to JK BJP from Gadkari over Sarore toll plaza: Bhalla | Raman Suri urged Government to widen Mahamaya temple road | Soaring prices have made common man's life miserable: Harsh Dev | Guru Govind Singh Ji's Parkash Utsav to celebrate on 2nd January | Kashmiri Khatri Hindu Maha Sahba highlights grievances KPs | DC Kathua visits snow affected Bani area; traffic restored | Sunday markets buzz with heavy rush of customers | Youth Cong pays tributes to Darshan Raina | DC visits snow bound Marwah valley | BSF organizes medical camp | Kabir Nirwan Divas to be celebrated on Feb 16 | Training programme on Vermi compost production organized | Randhir Singh pays tributes to G. M. SADIQ | GCPF demands payment of arrears | Lok Adalat held at Akhnoor | CPI(M) condemns Dr. Abdullah's detention | NSC terms Abdullah's detention undemocratic | SCC visits Bal Ashram | TLSC organises Lok Adalat at Hiranagar | Back Issues  
news details
HC dismisses appeal of Vigilance, upheld acquittal of Supdt & ors
8/14/2019 10:56:11 PM
Early Times Report
Jammu, Aug 14: (JNF):
In an appeal filed by State Vigilance Organization against the acquittal of Charan Dass, Superintendent of Examination in connivance with Prem Kumar, Deputy Superintendent, Examination and Supervisor Parshotam Sharma, Justice Sanjeev Kumar after hearing both the sides dismissed the appeal and upheld the acquittal.
Briefly stated the prosecution story as is gatherable from the judgment impugned is that the complainant Sandip Kumar Gupta lodged a written complaint with the Vigilance Organization, Jammu with the allegation that he was appearing in the Biannual examination of 10+2 which was being conducted in the examination hall situated in Luthra Public School, Talab Tillo, Jammu. It was alleged that one Charan Dass, Superintendent of Examination in connivance with Prem Kumar, Deputy Superintendent, Examination and Supervisor Parshotam Sharma were demanding money from the candidates appearing in the examination so as to allow them copying in the examination. He claims that during his first paper in the month of September 2001, the respondent-accused Parshotam Sharma demanded Rs 16,000 from him for permitting him copying in the examination hall, but, later on, the deal was settled for Rs 9000. He alleged that he paid and the respondent-accused Parshotam Sharma accepted Rs 4500 for facilitating copying in the second paper. He further claims that he appeared in the examination and after two/three papers, the respondent-accused asked him to pay him the balance amount. It is alleged that the complainant, who was supposed to appear in the Physics (B) paper on 08.01.2001, carried Rs 4500 for paying it to the respondent Parshotam Sharma. However, he was persuaded by his neighbour namely Suresh Kohli, to approach Vigilance Organization Jammu and lodge a complaint in this regard. He, accordingly, lodged a complaint and a trap was laid in which the respondents were allegedly caught red handed demanding and accepting bribe of Rs 4500. The Vigilance Organization Jammu, after completion of investigation, presented the challan before the trial court.
Justice Sanjeev Kumar after hearing both the sides observed that the view taken by the trial Court based on available evidence is unexceptionable and even if, upon evaluation of evidence led by the prosecution, it is possible to take a view different from the one taken by the trial Court, the same would not be permissible for this Court to do so. In this regard, law is well settled that while hearing an acquittal appeal, if the appellate Court comes to the conclusion that on the basis of evidence on record, two views are possible, in that event, the view that favours the accused has to be taken. The trial Court has correctly returned a finding that there was no demand ever made by any of the respondents-accused and this is substantiated by the statement of complainant and other witnesses. The trial Court has rightly doubted the statement of shadow witness namely Constable Mohd Riaz on the ground that in the presence of availability of independent witnesses accompanying the trap party, the interested witness should not have been put up as a shadow witness. It is this witness only who deposed with regard to demand of bribe made by the respondents-accused. That apart, it is not only the demand, but the acceptance by the respondents and also the recovery from the possession of the accused is required to be proved to constitute the offences under Sections 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act read with 161 RPC.
With these observations, High Court is of the view that the judgment passed by the trial Court is legally and factually correct and does not call for any interference in this appeal filed by the appellant. JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
Early Times Android App
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
Train Enquiry
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center