Like our Facebook Page

Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
Breaking News :   J-K: Security forces eliminate terrorist behind minor, CRPF personnel killing | Prime Minister Narendra Modi, CDS General Bipin Rawat reach Leh amid LAC tensions with China | Geelani dumped by friends, foes | No confidence motion moved against prez, vice prez of Kathua MC | Security threat, slow internet may delay privatization of power sector in J&K | Yudhvir Sethi releases album without wearing face mask, violates COVID protocol | Poor family deprived of Govt schemes | Employees suffer as 15 percent staff runs District Fund Office Reasi | India deploys Special Forces units in Ladakh amid military standoff with China | Rajnath''s planned visit to Ladakh rescheduled: Sources | JK sees spurt in Corona Virus related deaths as 10 more people die, toll reaches 115 | Devotional song ‘Sabki Rakhna Laaj Sai’ released | KKHMS pays rich tributes to Amar Nath Vashnavi | Jan hails efforts of front line warriors | Gdc Paloura organises national level online poster making competition | University of Jammu organizes national level online quiz | Dr Jitendra reviews developmental works of Udhampur- Kathua- Doda | KPs threaten to launch protest if cash assistance not enhanced | 4 die while cleaning well in Kupwara | Protests amidst pandemic | Imran fiddles when Balochistan burns | Penetration of Chinese Smartphone in India | COVID-19: A SWOT ANALYSIS | Security dilemma of nations in South Asia | Police produces chargesheet against Yaseen Malik in unlawful activities case | Use of mosques by militants to target forces highly reprehensible: Spl DG CRPF | ACB arrest then Chief Supervisor FCI Godown Udhampur in misappropriation case | Earthquake of magnitude 3.6 strikes near Katra | Pakistan violates ceasefire in Poonch, Indian Army retaliates | DC conducts first e-Darbar with public of Tehsil Bhalwal | Two IT Parks coming up in Srinagar, Jammu: Dwivedi | Div Com reviews land acquisition cases for New Grid Stations | Munish Gupta asks government to step in & solve problems of residents | Chief Justice e-inaugurates online Workshop on “Law Governing Forests, Wildlife and Environment” | DC suspends Executive Officer Municipal Council Baramulla; attaches him with his office | Broad daylight murder of youth triggers panic in town | 21 fresh positive, 1777 cumulative cases, 26 recovered, 25 deaths so far in north Kashmir | IIT Roorkee to launch Global Network of alumni | Moral, ethical education must for child’s overall development: Raina | ISM (AYUSH) distributes immunity booster kits | Jammu to house first govt sponsored artificial rock climbing wall at scenic Surinsar | Reinvent Jammu as most beautiful city: Citizens’ Forum | COVID19: J&K Prisons Department begin video conference facility to interact with inmates, families | DDC chairs DLTFC meeting, approves 77 loans under JKREGP | More collective efforts needed to defeat corona: Jugal Kishore | Director RDD&PR Jammu inspect various development works | Sopore girl first to get JK domicile certificate | HC issues notices in PIL seeking interest waive-off on loan amount | Court grants five days police custody of ex-MD SICOP in DA Case | Silk factories at Jammu, Srinagar to benefit over 40 thousand Cocoon rearing families | TFJ starts rotational tea, coffee langar facility for public | Mayor distributes domicile certificates | AUJAA greets VC SKUAST | Agriculture Deptt organizes Farmers Camp at Panchayats Chandak, Dana | BDC along with Sarpanchs, Panchs hold protest against TRB Construction Company | Safai karmacharis of JMC threaten to go on strike | Harsh Dev Singh wants early eviction of former ministers, legislators of BJP from govt accommodation | Vocational Instructors stage protest, seek redressal of demands | Back Issues  
news details
Supreme Court rules no probe into Rafale deal, new bench for Sabarimala case; closes contempt case against Rahul Gandhi
11/14/2019 2:13:25 PM
New Delhi: It was a big day in the Supreme Court on Thursday (November 14, 2019) with verdicts in three politically and socially important cases - plea against clean chit to the Centre in the Rafale fighter aircraft deal, petitions challenging entry of women into the Sabarimala Temple, and the contempt case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi - being delivered. The big judgment day came just five days after the historic verdict in the decades-old Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri Masjid case in Ayodhya and a day after the ruling to bring the office of the Chief Justice of Indian under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

With Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, before his retirement on November 17, heading the benches in all the three cases, the verdicts on Rafale deal, Sabarimala Temple order and contempt court against Rahul Gandhi were pronounced on Thursday morning back-to-back
v\Here's a look at the top court's verdicts in the aforementioned cases:

Sabarimala Temple review

The Supreme Court referred the issue of entry of women into Sabarimala Temple and other religious places to a larger seven-judge bench. The apex court, in a 3:2 verdict, referred the Sabarimala issue to the larger bench. Justices RF Nariman and DY Chandrachud dissented while Chief Justice Gogoi and Justices Indu Malhotra and AM Khanwilkar were in favour of referring the matter to a larger bench.

The apex court said that the entry of women into places of worship is not just limited to the Sabarimala Temple but also includes issues like allowing Muslim and Parsi women to enter religious practice. Reading out the judgement, Chief Justice Gogoi stated that issues such as Muslim women's entry into mosques, right of Parsi women who married outside the community to access towers of silence, have been referred to a larger bench.

In September 2018 judgement, SC had lifted the ban that prevented menstruating women and girls between the age of 10 to 50 from entering Sabarimala Temple dedicated to Lord Ayyappa in Kerala. However, the court did not put a stay on its order on Thursday.

According to this order, women of all ages can visit the shrine till a larger bench decides this issue.

Rafale deal verdict

The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition seeking a probe into the Rafale deal. Justice SK Kaul while reading the judgement said that the review petition, challenging its 2018 order, is without merit. The top court dismissed a plea seeking lodging of an FIR to probe the Rafale deal inked with Dassault Aviation.

The 36 Rafale fighter aircraft deal for the Indian Air Force (IAF) was signed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA). The top court on Thursday gave a clean chit to the government.

The petitions demanded a CBI probe into the purchase of Rafale fighter jets from France.

SC had in its 2018 order given a clean chit to the Narendra Modi government on a plea seeking investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of the fighter jets.

The top court had on December 14, 2018, dismissed petitions seeking court-monitored probe into Rafale fighter jet deal, saying that there was no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the deal. The top court had also said that it was not its job to go into the issue of pricing of fighter planes. After which, review petitions were filed by former union ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie, lawyer Prashant Bhushan and others against the judgement.

Contempt plea against Rahul Gandhi

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court closed a contempt plea filed by BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for wrongly attributing to the apex court his "chowkidar chor hai" comment with a warning to exercise more caution in future. The apex court ruled that Rahul Gandhi "needs to be more careful in future" for attributing to the court his remarks.

A bench of Chief Justice Gogoi and Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph said that Rahul, being a person holding a place of importance in the political spectrum, should have been more careful before attributing to the top court certain things which were not part of the order.

Lekhi had accused the Congress leader of misquoting the April 10, 2019, order of the Supreme Court. He had allegedly said that the apex court had accepted that "chowkidar" (a reference to Prime Minister Modi), is a "chor" (thief). The top court then issued a contempt notice against Rahul and said that he had to either offer an apology or face criminal contempt.

Subsequently, Rahul tendered an unconditional apology and sought closure of the contempt proceedings against him.

During the course of proceedings, former Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, who represented Lekhi, had argued that Gandhi's apology should be rejected and action must be taken against him.
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
Early Times Android App
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
Train Enquiry
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center