x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   New changes worth learning between the two moons and earth | Nature-Based Solutions for the Air Pollution Crisis: A Green Path to Cleaner Cities | ‘Vande Mataram’ | Commitment, dedication will make ‘Bharat Viksit’: LG Sinha | BJP brings in Jugal Kishore to pacify ‘annoyed’ workers | Judicial panel invites public testimonies in Leh clash probe | Doctor from Kashmir arrested in UP for posting JeM posters | Didn’t authorise celebration of 150th anniversary of ‘Vande Mataram’ in schools: CM Omar | EOW chargesheets 4 Revenue officials | 150 years on, ‘Vande Mataram’ continues to ignite eternal flame of Nationalism: Amit Shah | Srinagar Court convicts Police Sub-Inspector for forging DOB | Date of regularization, not ad hoc entry, decisive for pension: HC | HC upholds detention of woman OGW | Seniority can’t be re-fixed through contempt petitions: DB | Maternity leave is a right: CAT | Back Issues  
 
news details
Court rejects pre-arrest bail in theft case
8/15/2020 12:17:06 AM
EARLY TIMES REPORT

JAMMU, Aug 14 (JNF): 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu Vinder Singh Bhou cancelled the pre-arrest bail given to one Ashu, who was allegedly involved in FIR No 45/2020 u/s 436/458/427/380/506 IPC.
2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu Virender Singh Bhou after hearing APP DP Singh for the UT observed that in view of the report and the other material on record, grant of bail to the accused in terms of section 438 CrPC is unwarranted because on balancing rights of the accused and that of the society and complainant, rights of the latter have an edge and grant of bail to the accused would shatter the faith and confidence of the public at large in the judicial system and also apprehension of prosecution that accused in case of bail would give a slip to the investigation and law, appears to be genuine and well founded having regard to the antecedents of the accused. The offences alleged against the accused are heinous in nature, the exercise of discretion for grant of anticipatory bail thus, cannot be exercised. The plea of learned counsel for the applicant-accused that bail once granted cannot be cancelled is not tenable because Court while granting interim bail has not taken into consideration the police report and the facts, which emerge there from against the accused and since the absolute bail has not been granted, there is no bar to terminate the interim bail granted in anticipation of arrest by this Court. Post bail conduct of the accused is also not satisfactory as per I.O because he is not cooperating with him and rather threatening the prosecution witnesses from deposing against him. For the reasons assigned herein above, and having regards to the nature of accusations against the accused, severity of the punishment for the offences alleged against the accused, possibility of tampering with evidence and threatening the witnesses being not ruled out, the Court is not inclined to grant absolute bail to the accused and the interim bail granted to the accused on 14.03.2020 is cancelled and bail application is dismissed. JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU