news details |
|
|
| Exploitation of unemployed youth to be fought tooth, nail: Harshdev Singh | | | Early Times Report
Jammu, June 15: Lambasting the recommendations finalized by the Cabinet Sub Committee (CSC), comprising of 6 cabinet rank Ministers, for review of the proposed 'New Recruitment Policy', Harsh Dev Singh JKNPP Chairman and Former Minister has described the exercise as a cosmetic whitewash with no serious endeavour on the part of said committee to address the genuine concerns of the unemployed youth and students.
According to press release, he pointed out that the New Recruitment Policy having been rejected by the youth and civil society and the relevant ordinance on the subject having been returned by the Governor, the state govt. had assured to revisit the said policy so as to dispel the apprehensions and to accommodate the concerns of the educated youth. He however regretted that the CSC consisting of 6 tyro Ministers, three each from BJP and PDP failed to do justice to their job and finalized its report for preparation of final draft by GAD and law Deptts. without making any significant changes in the previous policy. Accusing the CSC for indulging in superficial patch work in the name of re-drafting policy under the compulsion posed by massive students outrage, Singh said that there was no serious effort on the part of Ministers concerned to meet the aspirations of the youth.
Terming the proposed changes in the Recruitment Policy as eye wash and mere window dressing, he pointed out that the CSC has merely reduced the period of contractual / adhoc service from 7 yrs to 5 yrs for the purpose of regularization and inclusion of one member each from PSC and SSB for such recruitments at district level for gazetted and non gazetted level posts respectively.
Ridiculing the report of the CSC which stated that the New Recruitment Policy would be applicable only for filling of vacancies of "immediate nature" and that the "normal appointments" would be made through the prescribed agencies of PSC and SSB, he questioned the criteria for the aforesaid categorization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
