news details |
|
|
| Court rejects bail in rape & murder case | | |
EARLY TIMES REPORT
JAMMU, Sept 22: Principal Sessions Judge Ramban, Kishore Kumar rejected the bail application of one Ashiq Hussain, son of Gul Mohd of Sar Mundhar Kastigarh District Doda, who was allegedly involved in rape and murder case.
Court after hearing both the sides observed that perusal of the police report reveals that on 30.0.2020 Police Station, Banihal received information from reliable sources that one dead body of a woman is lying in a decomposed condition at Thandi Shawan jungle. The proceedings under Section 174 Cr.P.C were commenced and during the proceedings it was surfaced that the victim named not disclosed aged about 20/21 years was raped by accused Ashiq Hussain continuously on the pretext of getting married with her. Due to the forced repeated sexual assault committed upon victim, she became pregnant and the accused compelled her to abort the pregnancy which was not agreed by the victim. Thereafter a conspiracy was hatched and the victim was called on the pretext of executing Nikaah with the accused Ashiq Hussain and taken to some unknown place in the jungle by accused Nisar Ahmed. She was kept in a dhok for one night and on the next day i.e 30.06.2020 she was killed brutally by the accused Nisar Ahmed. The accused Ashiq Hussain had engaged a supari killer namely Nisar Ahmed to kill the victim. An advance payment of Rs 30,000 was paid to the accused-Nisar Ahmed through money transfer by the J&K Bank. Both the accused persons have been arrested and are in custody.
Principal Sessions Judge Ramban, Kumar further observed that it is true that offences of abduction, rape and murder are more serious offences in the society and the person who is prima facie found to have committed such offences is not entitled to the concession of bail.
Moreover, in view of the discussion made herein above, accused cannot be admitted to bail in such a heinous and gruesome crime committed against an innocent girl, by raping and thereafter killing her. For the foregoing reasons, the Court is of the view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case for granting the bail in his favour, as such, his bail application is rejected. JNF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
