x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   After China visit, arrested YouTuber applied for Bangladesh visa on instructions of ISI mentors | NIA, IB grilling Jyoti Malhotra | Poonch at the heart of ‘Op Sindoor’ as Army inflicts heavy losses on Pak | Achieve goal of terror-free J&K: LG Sinha | PM to inaugurate 103 Amrit Stations | Will ensure safe, smooth Amarnath Yatra, Kheer Bhawani mela: CM Omar | Allotment of state land: ACB books Revenue officials | Military infra in POJK’s Leepa Valley decimated: Army | ‘3/4th of India’s population at ‘high’ to ‘very high’ heat risk’ | Retreat ceremony along Pak border to resume today | IB Chief gets 1-year extension | Domicile certificate services moved to another portal | ‘Curb use of illegal ripening agents’ | BDS destroys live Pak shell | KVK Kishtwar concludes 15 days certificate course on INM | Apni Party leaders visit shelling victims in Surankote | DDC Doda inaugurates Space, STEM Labs | Secretary Shashanka Ala chairs review meeting | Govt Polytechnic Jammu conducts admission awareness Campaign | DC Kishtwar launches Skill Development program | GDC Kishtwar develops Vertical Garden using recycled bottles | Anti- drug IEC campaigns organises | Restructuring HUDD | CISF's Geeta Samota becomes first officer from force to scale Mount Everest | Designate protection officers to ensure safety of women from domestic abuse: SC to States, UTs | Foreign Secretary Misri briefs parliamentary delegations ahead of their visits abroad | Pakistan's fate is to perish: Adityanath | SP South inspires MAM College students with lecture on drug abuse | Army commander reviews operational preparedness during 2-day visit to Suratgarh Military Station | No air defence guns deployed in Golden Temple premises during Op Sindoor, says Army | Kavinder accuses Mehbooba Mufti of echoing Pakistani propaganda | June 2025 Term-End Examinations of IGNOU rescheduled | Court rejects bail in Rs 250 crore heroin smuggling case | JMC intensifies efforts to make city garbage-free | Ramban police traced out 10 missing persons in one week | Monsoon likely to reach Kerala in 4-5 days: IMD | Veteran Nuclear Scientist M R Srinivasan no more | Live For Others - Being Helpful Foundation Announces New Provincial Team | Apni Party urges CTO Jammu to expedite drainage, desilting works ahead of monsoon | Agriculture Department Jammu celebrates World Bee Day | Impressive 'JAI HIND YATRA' taken by Congress in Jammu City | Nagrad Adbi Sangam Mourns Narender Safaya's demise | NMC president urges LG , CM to raise pensioners' medical allowance | Jammu police detain six vehicles in rural zone | World Honeybee Day celebrated at SKUAST-Jammu | Aryan Sharma shines with third place in Inter-School Hindi debate | Desh Bhagat University joins the International Association of Universities (IAU) | MVEANS shine in10th & 12th CBSE result | Allen Chandigarh students excel in CBSE Class 10 | Dewan Devi Public School holds Poster Making Competition | GDC RS Pura hosts Ornamental Plantation Drive | Geeta Samota becomes first CISF personnel to conquer Mt Everest | IQAC and Art of Living Jammu launch 5-day Yoga Wellness Retreat for Staff | Govt College for Women Jammu NSS holds session on summer internship guidance | Back Issues  
 
news details
Stranger to arbitration agreement cannot be treated as respondent in proceeding: HC
10/17/2022 10:27:37 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, Oct 17: The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court holds that If a stranger to an arbitration agreement between the two parties can have no locus to invoke the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 so is the inverse situation that a stranger to an arbitration agreement cannot be located as a respondent in a proceeding initiated by one of the parties against another party under the arbitration agreement unless and until the case would fall in the frame.
Justice Rahul Bharti while disposing of the petition after hearing Advocate Karan Sharma for the petitioner whereas Anil Kher, Sr. Advocate with Inderjeet Gupta, Advocate. Yatin Mahajan, Advocate. Vishal Garg, Advocate And Bari Abdullah, Advocate for the respondents, observed that the application of the appellants read with the present appeal failed purely on the point that a non-party to an arbitration agreement has been entangled in the proceeding under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act so in case if any application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is opted and/or advised to be filed by the appellants against the respondent no.1-M/s Irshad Hussain Wani & Co., then the dismissal of the earlier application as well as this appeal shall not be meant to be causing any prejudice to any such application of the appellants and also to any defence/objection as may be set up by the respondent no.1 in response to the said new application of the appellants.
The point in this case is about sustainability of an application, filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for seeking any of the enlisted directions/measures therein, aimed against a third party which is not a party/privy to the arbitration agreement and/or the subject matter of the contract between the arbitration bound parties.
The respondent no.1-M/s Irshad Hussain Wani & Co. and the appellant nos. 1 & 2 are parties to a notarized agreement dated 14.07.2016. In terms of this agreement, as per its clause (10), an arbitration clause stands provided contemplating that any dispute arising between the parties relatable to the contract to be referred to an arbitration for resolution of the dispute. 4. It seems that the respondent no.1- M/s Irshad Hussain Wani & Co., in its own right, as being a business concern was having business dealing with the respondent No.3 -the Ericsson India Private Limited well before making of the agreement dated 14.07.2016 with the appellants. By reference to the business relationship between the respondent no.1 and the respondent no.3-the Ericsson India Private Limited, the appellants and the respondent no.1 had executed the above said agreement for the purpose of working out investments to be made from their respective end for enabling the respondent no.1 to carry out the business engagements of the respondent no.1 with the respondent no.3 -the Ericsson India Private Limited. For sure, the respondent no.3-the Ericsson India Private Limited had and has no concern, by any stretch of express or implied reference and relation, with the said agreement dated 14.07.2016 of the appellants with the respondent no.1. In fact, in terms of clause (4) of the said agreement, it is clearly stipulated that the appellants had to have no concern with the respondent no.3-the Ericsson India Private Limited. Thus it was well known to the appellant all along that they were not to relate themselves through said agreement dated 14.07.2016 with the respondent no. 1 to the respondent no. 3-the Ericsson India Private Limited. This agreement dated 14.07.2016 was followed by making of a supplementary agreement dated 22.03.2017 between very same two parties i.e., the appellants on one hand and the respondent no. 1-M/s Irshad Hussain Wani & Co., on other hand.
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU