The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently flagged a growing and deeply concerning trend — the radicalisation of inmates within Indian prisons. This issue, though long lurking beneath the surface, has now emerged as a serious internal security concern, warranting immediate and strategic intervention. The prison ecosystem, marked by confinement, limited oversight, and the psychological vulnerabilities of inmates, can easily become a breeding ground for extremist ideologies. Recognising this, the MHA has issued detailed guidelines aimed at screening, monitoring, and de-radicalising individuals susceptible to extremist influence behind bars. Prisons are meant to be centres of reform and rehabilitation. However, the MHA rightly warns that the very nature of these institutions — closed environments marked by social alienation and rigid group dynamics — makes them fertile territory for radical elements to spread extremist views. Inmates, especially those disillusioned by systemic injustices or personal trauma, can become easy targets for indoctrination by hardened ideologues. Once radicalised, they pose a grave risk not only within the prison but also outside, upon their release. To tackle this, the MHA has proposed a multi-layered approach. The guidelines recommend screening of inmates at entry, periodic risk assessment, and segregation of high-risk prisoners to prevent the spread of extremist ideologies. The emphasis on enhanced surveillance and the introduction of de-radicalisation programmes signal a shift from a reactive to a preventive strategy — a move that must be welcomed and actively implemented across all correctional facilities. However, implementation must go beyond mere surveillance. There is a need to create an environment where constructive engagement, mental health support, educational opportunities, and spiritual counselling are made available to vulnerable inmates. De-radicalisation is not a one-time intervention but a sustained process that involves both correctional officers and civil society partners, including psychologists, religious leaders, and trained social workers. It is also crucial to train prison staff to detect early signs of radicalisation. Many prison personnel are ill-equipped to handle the ideological indoctrination methods employed by radical groups. Regular training programmes, sensitisation workshops, and inter-agency coordination will be key to building a prison ecosystem resilient to extremist threats. Equally important is data-driven intelligence sharing between central and state agencies. A centralised database of high-risk individuals, along with behavioral monitoring and psychological profiling, can aid in both prevention and timely intervention. The use of technology, including AI-enabled surveillance and voice recognition tools, can bolster efforts to track covert communications among inmates. India is not alone in facing this challenge. Globally, countries have recognised the threat posed by radicalisation in prisons — a phenomenon that has contributed to violent extremism even after inmates complete their sentences. The MHA’s proactive stance indicates an understanding that prisons are not isolated institutions; they are integral to the larger architecture of national security. |