news details |
|
|
| Order on tainted cops’ bail plea reserved for Nov 23 | | AMANDEEP MURDER CASE | | Early Times Report
Jammu, Nov 11: Special Judge Anticorruption Jammu JR Kotwal today reserved order on bail applications filed by former SSP Jammu S Manohar Singh, then SHO Gandhi Nagar Sultan Mirza and then IO Sub-Inspector Satnam Singh lodged in the Central Jail. Court, after considering the bail applications and the arguments of counsel for the applicants, reserved the order on bail application for November 23, 2009.
In the meanwhile, Principal Sessions Judge Jammu BL Bhat, while disposing off an application filed by Jatinder Singh alias Raja son of Choudhary Nagar Singh praying for his shifting from District Jail Jammu to Central Jail Kot Balwal Jammu, ordered that the applicant be shifted to Central Jail Kotbalwal Jammu with immediate effect and submit compliance report in the Court.
Earlier, while opposing the bail applications of arrested and suspended police officers the SIT in its objections filed in FIR No 275/2009 u/s 5(2) PC Act 2006 r/w section 161/165-A RPC submitted that there is at strong case depicting payment of bribe to fudge the weapon of offence and ammunition of offence/ FSL label and subsequent recovery of alleged bribe amount to the tune of Rs 3.10 lakh made from Sarwar Hussain Bukhari Ballistic Expert and Rs 40, 000 from constable Raj Singh, who was attached to the FSL.
In the objections it has been submitted that accused Choudhary Nagar Singh, Jagar Singh, Rakesh Kumar are absconding who have abetted the commission of fudging of weapon of offence after entering into conspiracy with the accused who had the control over the seized weapon of offence which was important piece of offence in the murder of Amandeep Singh. It is only after the arrest of Nagar Singh and his two brothers, the mode of payment of bribe and other facts would come up and circumstances attending their would become crystal clear. The grant of bail at this stage would jeopardize the investigation which could lead to spoiling of the whole evidence connected with the case. There is ample evidence about the fudging of evidence to which the accused are instrumental. The statements of witnesses recorded in this behalf have already deposed before the Court of law about the tempering of collateral evidence. Any concession at this stage in shape of bail or otherwise would embolden the accused and they may indulge in such crime undeterred and unchecked in further and accordingly sought dismissal of the bail applications of the arrested police officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
