news details |
|
|
| Neither of Soz nor of Azad’s lobby, some Congress leaders are with whom? | | |
EARLY TIMES REPORT
JAMMU, JAN 7:
Pradesh Congress used to hit headlines soon after the divide based on lobbyism surfaced. During his Chief Ministeship, Ghulam Nabi Azad accommodated few Congressmen to assist him to reach out all the assignments by him. These few Congress men took advantage of this opportunity to become loyalists of Azad and not of the party and people. Similarly, after Prof. saif-u-Din Soz took the reigns of president ship several Congressmen in greed to become ministers in cabinet showcased loyalty to Soz, thus JKPCC got divided into two factions. Congressmen from Valley as well as from Jammu are divided in two factions because of not ideology of party or the leaders but on the pretext of their own interest. It is Congress at regional level.
Question does not arise that several Congressmen including ministers, legislators and portfolio holders who are with Soz lobby nor with the Azad’s then whom lobby they are with? Don’t think them non controversial or peace lovers but they are new dimension of the Congress within the Congress called as Corporate Congress. These stalwarts found it wise to let the lobby followers keep quarreling and they in old tradition of politics use to exploited both factions and even ministers of Congress-National Conference by making them to inaugurate projects either directly owned by the or indirectly benefit them. Imagine Congress at corporate level.
At sub-regional level Congress has a different story to tell. As there are several sub regions people of where feel deprived and discriminated in terms political representation and development. But for an unfortunate sub region wherein more three ministers by Congress has been engaged to fulfill aspirations of masses, forget their moral duties to work for uplifting of poor masses, got themselves engaged in egoism for nothing. People of the region feel ashamed to mandate the people of such stature who fight for their false ego and not for their genuine rights. It is egoistic Congress.
Time changed so changed the politics and the relation between leaders and workers particularly in Congress result of which workers did not respect their leaders and leaders did not bother about their party workers. Favoritism is everywhere and why not in Congress. Recently, Congress hold competition of forthcoming portfolio holders and about three hundred were annoyed by the party decision by selecting one of the relative of old Congress stalwart.
It seems in Congress, leaders are either are not in a mood to understand policies framed by its leaders at national level or prefer to earn their investment which they start right from the entering in party to becoming a minister. Congress leaders hardly know difference between becoming a leader to becoming a ruler, as ruler opt usually for trade and business and the leaders for services and sacrifices which obviously is impractical in present era even for laymen and then minister is a minister for few years only!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
