news details |
|
|
| J&K Cricket Association Vs Former Selection Committee | | Court restrained former committee members for interference | |
Jammu, October:- City Judge Jammu Mr. Pawan Dev Kotwal today in a suit filed by Joint Secretary J&K Cricket Association Vs Former Selection Committee members, restrained them from causing interference in selection process initiated by the association. Court further held that this order is however, subject to objections from other-side and shall remain in operation till the next date. In the meanwhile court allowed applicant to complete formalities in compliance with the provisions of order 39, R-3 CPC and shall filed an affidavit.
In the suit an application also came to be filed seeking interim injunction restraining the defendants (former Committee members) from claiming themselves as selectors of the J&K Cricket Association and from interfering in selection process of the team by the selection sub-committee constituted by the working committee of association in its meeting July 18, 2006.
Mr. Pawan Dev Kotwal after hearing Advocate Vishal Sharma appearing for the association also perused minutes of working committee meeting of the association held on April 18, 2006 and July 18, 2006, observed that it reveals that the applicant has sought decree for permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the non-applicants from causing any interference in the selection process of team by the association, on the ground that the non-applicants ceased to be members of the selection committee on formation of new Committees. Court further observed that association constituted various committees including the selection committee by virtue of resolution July 18, 2006 and the applicant as prima-facie case and non-applicants appears to be members of earlier selection committee constituted on July 10, 2003 and with formation of new selection committee, they prima-facie appears to have ceased to be the members of the selection committee, as such the applicants has a prima-facie case, for the time being, and issuance of prior notice may defeat the purpose of the suit and put the applicant to bear irreparable loss or injury. With these observations Court restrained non-applicants for causing interference in the selection process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
