x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   In five years, Govt owned companies incur losses worth Rs 3000 crores | Another Kashmiri politician to send his kid abroad for studies | Resentment in BJP against proposing new comers as DDC chairmen | Emboldened AEE of I&FC pays no heed to orders of seniors, does not do his duty | LG cautions people against rumour mongers over COVID-19 vaccination | Mehbooba averts clash between PDP leaders, likely to visit Jammu on 20 | No end in sight for unemployed Dental Surgeons in JK UT | 20 ITBP personnel among first Covid vax recipients | Making of a General : A Himalayan Echo | Parthenium-A Threat to Agro-Eco System | Scientific Lexicography: Earlier, contemporary and prospective! | Dharmarth Trust employees threaten to take ‘Samuhik Jal Samadhi’ on Feb 1 | Proud moment, says kin of Kashmiri-origin woman named in Biden team | KPs have biggest stake in delimitation process: Chrungoo | Vishwakarma Sabha elections schedule released | Credible elected to CCI Jammu will develop institution: Raman Suri | Physically challenged protest against JKSSRB | Horticulture Deptt organizes farmers training programme | IndiGo to launch flight services between Delhi, Leh on Feb 22 | SMVDU faculty delivers invited Talk on communication skills | Amandeep XI Amritsar defeats Vishal XI Jammu, clinches series by 2-1 | ZEOs defy CEO's order, refuse to release TA of employees | Poonch Admin sitting on State land encroachment issue | Constructed by SICOP over a year back, toilet complex in industrial area awaits inauguration | JK has just one percent of active cases of COVID-19; 109 new cases, one fresh death | Paloura shootout: Family of injured youth alleges police inaction, blocked road | Advisor Baseer Khan to hear public grievances at Sgr on Jan 18 | History will remember Rahul for standing against present regime: Mehbooba | Police produce charge sheet against 11 LeT operatives | No representative from J&K in Rajya Sabha from Feb 16 | 7 DCs among 13 officers transferred in Jammu & Kashmir | COVID-19: Sanitation Supervisor administered first vaccine dose in Jammu hospital | Dwivedi chairs State Level Committee meeting, clears Rs 12.43 cr subsidy claims | IG Police pitches for joint action to make JJ Act on ground | Cong questions change of women reservation roaster for DDC chairpersons | Traffic on NH44 allowed after trial run of Bailey Bridge at Kaila Morh | Court rejects bail of two employees of BDO Mahore in fraud case | CB carries searches at travel agencies over sale of air tickets on exorbitant rates | Prof Soz condemns arrest of mainstream political leaders in Kashmir | Five militant associates held for pasting threat posters | Supreme Court should immediately hear Article 370: Omar Abdullah | Advisor Bhatnagar kick starts Covid-19 vaccination in Kashmir | DC inaugurates COVID-19 vaccination at DH Ramban | Maya Bhagat assures welfare for People | FFMA protests in support of Dharmarth Trust employees | Seeks comprehensive special development package for Chenab Valley | DC administers oath to vice president MC Kishtwar | Two J&K policemen receive awards for saving lives during Pakistan ceasefire violations | AP expresses concern over continuous closure of highway | TMF hails nationwide vaccination drive | 133 Sub-Inspectors of J&K Police promoted | Handicrafts directorate hosts workshop on Aesthetic Packaging at Jammu | Three month long programme on Innovation, Incubation and Training launched | Traffic awareness drive held | GDC Sidhra organises extension Extension lecture | Webinar on "Energy Conservation" by YCET faculty | DSEJ celebrates National Youth Day to mark birth anniversary of Swami Vivekananda | Two Days Kissan Goshti under ATMA organized | Div Com Jammu reviews arrangements for All India Mushaira, Kavi Sammelan | Back Issues  
 
news details
Black deeds under ‘Roshni’-B
12/1/2020 11:37:54 PM
M.M.Khajooria

As far as the Land Mafia and Siyasi Sarkari land grabbers were, concerned, the state appeared to be either privy to their nefarious, activities or otherwise felt constrained to look the other way. Having said that, it may be conceded that provisio-ns of the Act of 2001 by and large conformed to constitutional norms and propriety. The government of the, day also showed sensitivity to public criticism and refrained from framing Rules under the act in haste.
The Jammu and Kashmir State Lands (Vesting of ownership to the, occupants) Act, 2001 mandated selling or regularizing of the occupied State Lands at market prices to both, authorized and unauthorized occupants and also provided for auctioning of the vacant state lands publicly.
The act was first amended in -2004 by the PDP Congress coalition.
That the amendment was meant to serve the vested interests may be illustrated b .1) According to Section 2 (C) of the original act “available State land means any State land, which was “not in possession of any person or which has been encroached upon by any person.” The words “or which has been encroached upon by any person” were deleted by 2004 amendment.
2. In terms of Section 3 (c), the provision of the Act were not to apply on certain lands which included those earmarked for a specific purpose in any Master Plan. The Section 3 of the Act was also deleted by 2004 am -endment. Master plans embody. Master plans embodying longterm development perspectives were vital sacrosanct documents drafted by experts after in depth study, tremendous research and eliciting public opinion. That the protection provided for land assets earmarked public good was lifted by the coalition to benefit vested interests was beyond any shadow of doubt.
3.The 2001 Act provided for sale of State Land through public auction with predetermined Reserve Price. This was strictly in accordance with the general practice and the law as laid down bythe Supreme court. The amendment to the Act and provision inthe Roshni Rules shedding option of public auction and fixingprices of different categories violated or rather defied The above mentioned cardinal principal repeatedly reiterated by the Supreme Court. .
4.Section 10 of the Act contemplated creation of a separate fund under a proper account number in the J&K Bank in each district to allot an account head in which cost of the land realised under,this act should be deposited. No such Fund or Account was created. Instead amounts were deposited in Treasuries. The, revenue authorities didn’t even bother to conduct any reconciliation with concerned Treasuries. The CAG Report lamented that in status report in respect of Jammu district showed collection of Rupees 9.35 Crore but the treasury receipts’ attached with the application forms indicated receipt onlyRupees 8.33 Crore. An amount of more than one crore was unaccounted for.
5.Section 5 (b) of the Act, passed in 2001 provided that only such,occupants seeking transfer of ownership were eligible to apply who had been in actual physical possession of the land durithe period from 1 Januar 1990 to the commencement ofthe Act in a particular area. Thus the original Act (2001) limited the’’benefit of the scheme only to the long-term occupants. Under the 2004 Amendment to the Act, all those occupants who were in actual physical possession of the land, either personally or through their authorised agents, on the commencement of the2004 Amendment Act were made eligible to apply, irrespective of the length of period of occupation.This opened fresh flood gate for feverish land grabbing especially by those who had failed to do so earlier. Their nefarious designs were further facilitated by allegedly deliberate delay in the publication of the amendment inthe government gazette by about two months. Even though theGovernor had given his assent on 19th March, 2004, the amendments published in the gazette on 21st May, 2004. The act was tocome into force on the date of its publication in the government Gazette..
The Mother of Scams
The act stipulated that rules for the proper implementation of the act would be framed by the executive and required no ratification by the legislature. The Government notified the Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Owners hip to the Occupants Rules) on 25th August, 2005 about four years after the enactment which were ammended on 23rdNovember, 2006 and again on 5th March, 2007. Even a cursory reading would reveal that the rules framed under the act for its implementation were repugnant to the parent act and violated its stated scope and objectives. For instance, the Roshni Rules authorised agricultural lands free of cost, which was beyond the scope, objectives andmandatory provisio-ns of the act. This, according to CAG report enabled a large portion of nonagricultural land, 3.4 Lakh Kanals to be precise, being dubiously shown as agricultural which was “gifted” to favoured occupants for obvious consideration. The Government claimtdhat 19 lakh cultivators would benefit from the rule was not only absurd but a downright lie. Jammu and Kashmir state had less than 16 lakh,cultivators and only 16.27 per cent of them were known to have encroached upon government land.
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU