news details |
|
|
| Article 35-A created Muslim state in Indian territory: Ankur Sharma | | |  Early Times Report
JAMMU, Aug 3: Ankur Sharma, Chairman Ikk Jutt Jammu, described Article 35-A as an instrument of creating a Muslim state on the territory of India and hoped that Supreme Court of India will take notice of this reality sooner or later and declare it unconstitutional, null and void. He said that abrogation of Article 35-A is imperative in case, India has to remain a democracy based upon right to equality and secular polity where are religions are equal. He said that Article 35-A is brazenly a subversive process of the Constitution of India and renders Indian democracy redundant. Article 35-A is a testimony of the grim reality that Indian Constitution can be amended without the consent of the Parliament. It is dangerous import for Indian democracy and secularism has to be recognized. Sharma further said that Article 35-A has created a polity where all the Non-Muslims in J&K become second class subject people and females become subservient to male dominance. Therefore we saw State Government taking a stand on affidavit in Supreme Court in PIL titled Ankur Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors that majority community i.e Muslims will continue to take all minority benefits otherwise meant for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Christians and Jains of J&K. He warned all political parties not to play politics of expediency/appeasement and delay a decision on the constitutional status of Articke 35-A. The arguments given by the government so far to see somehow that hearing on the case is postponed signifies that wittingly or unwittingly, governments are becoming accomplices in the subversion of Indian Constitution. He said that Ikk Jutt Jammu has resolved to apprise the whole nation of the Muslim communal blackmail on this issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
