news details |
|
|
| HC grants 8 weeks for status report on recovering Gulmarg land | | | Early Times Report
Srinagar, Oct 16: The State High Court has granted eight weeks to government to file status report about the recovery of property whose lease has expired in Gulmarg, the world famous tourist and skiing resort.
Observing that contemporary law does not permit extension beyond permissible period, the High Court had already directed government to clear stand with regard to the recovery of the possession of the property where leases and licenses have expired in Gulmarg.
"It is trite that public property is held in public trust by the respondents (officials) and has to be dealt with in a non-arbitrary and transparent manner ensuring that public interest is best served," a division bench headed by Chief Justice Gita Mittal had said while hearing a Public Interest litigation last month.
"No person can be permitted to utilize the property with the intention of furthering of private interest of any person or authority. It has to be ensured that the maximum benefit results to the public as a result thereof," the court had said.
During the proceedings, the court's attention was drawn to SRO-580 wherein the maximum period for which a lease could be granted was 40 years.
"Obviously, no extension beyond this period is permissible," the court said and directed the official respondents to place on affidavit also their stand with regard to the recovery of the possession of the property where leases/licenses have expired.
"We shall also be informed in the affidavit about the manner in which such public property shall be dealt with. If the same is to be allowed to a private persons, the procedure which would be followed for the same." On the expiry of lease/license, the erstwhile lessee/licensee acquires the status of an unauthorized occupant within the meaning of Section 2(g) of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1988, the court underlined. "The respondents shall inform this Court with regard to the amount which the lessee/licensee were required to pay towards the grant of leases and the status of the payments by the lessees. This may be added in two additional columns to the tabulation which has been filed by the respondents," the court added. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
