news details |
|
|
| Court frames charges against OSD to CE, driver in trap case | | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Aug 25: Special Judge Anticorruption Jammu Mohan Singh Parihar framed corruption charges against Nazir Ahmed, OSD to Chief Engineer and driver Raju in trap case.
According to the ACB case that FIR was registered on the written complaint lodged by Suresh Kumar Gupta of Reasi, who is working as a contractor in PWD (R&B) Deptt under Self Help Group M/s Guru Nanak Builders Jammu. An amount of Rs 32.12 lakh was pending for payment by the PWD Deptt to him for work executed on Reasi-Angi Road. For release of the payment, he approached Chief Engineer Office PWD (R&B) Jammu number of time, where the accused Nazir Ahmed, OSD to Chief Engineer Nasir Goni, demanded bribe of Rs 70 thousand for release of Rs 10 lakh for pending funds.
On his complaint in this regard, Anti-Corruption Bureau Jammu laid a trap and OSD Nazir Ahmed was caught red handed while demanding and accepting Rs 70,000/-. Accused Raju Singh, then driver PWD (R&B) Chief Engineer Office Jammu had abetted the demand of bribe and accepted the same from complainant Suresh Kumar Gupta on the direction of accused Nazir Ahmed. After completion of investigation challan was presented.
Special Judge Anticorruption Jammu Mohan Singh Parihar after hearing APP Irshad Ahmed for the ACB observed that the allegations made in the charge sheet regarding the commission of the alleged offence have to be proved during the trial by adducing the evidence. The perusal of the charge sheet show that there is material on the record to proceed against the accused no. 1 and 2. The submissions made by counsel for the accused for the discharge of the accused are not acceptable under law as on the basis of the material on the record, prima facie the offence alleged are disclosed against both the accused and from the perusal of the charge sheet and the documents submitted there-with and on considering the oral submissions made by both sides, it transpires that prima facie, offences under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d), 4-A, PC Act Svt. 2006 are made out against the accused no. 1 offences under Section 4-F read with Sections 4-A, 5(2) read with Sections 5(1)(d) PC Act are made out against the accused no. 2 Accordingly, the charge for commission of aforesaid offences is framed against the accused no. 1 and 2. —JNF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
