news details |
|
|
| CAT directs Home department to appoint petitioner as Prosecuting Officer | | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Feb 11: A bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) comprising R S Jain (J) member and Anand Mathur member (A), directed official respondents to take into consideration the actual marks obtained before the interpolations and appoint the applicant Rohit Bhagat to the post of Prosecution Officer under Schedule Caste quota from the date the private respondents were appointed vide select list dated 30-11-2015.
Direction is issued to the respondent-department to fix the notional seniority of the applicant and fix his pay scale and all the benefits attached thereto, as per, rules on the basis that the applicant was entitled to being appointed from the year 2015, where his candidature for appointment was rejected due to fault of the respondent-department, but the applicant will not be entitled to back wages or any other financial benefit, save and except the notional seniority.
This judgment has been passed in a petition filed by one Rohit Bhagat through advocate Ravi Abrol, seeking direction to quash the selection/appointment of private respondents to the post of Prosecuting Officers made vide select list dated 30-11-2015 and also seeking direction to the respondents to take the marks awarded to answer no. 1 in section 3 as "7" instead of "4" and the total as "15" instead of "12" which were originally awarded to the petitioner, but late on tampered with to convert the merit of the petitioner into de-merit and as a consequence thereof to redraw the merit of the petitioner and select/appoint to the petitioner to the post of Prosecuting Officer under Scheduled Caste category with effect from the date the private respondents have been selected and appointed and grant him all consequential benefits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
