x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Doctors - The Unsung Heroes of Healthcare | WHEN RS 10 FEELS EXPENSIVE ON A CART, BUT NOT IN A CAFE | Urdu For Naib Tehsildar Recruitment Test | Yatri Niwas in Srinagar | LG Sinha inaugurates SASB Yatri Niwas at Pantha Chowk | LG launches campaign for zero-waste pilgrimage | 'Amarnath Yatra arrangements upgraded' | Heroin worth Rs. 420 crore seized in Rajasthan; Pak-based smuggler, Canada handler named | Within minutes after formation of PAC, NC mocks Sajad Lone’s new political front as ‘BJP’s B-Team’ | CM Omar calls for revival of buyer-creator relationship at SKICC Meet | Salal Dam gates opened amid rising Chenab Water levels | DGP chairs joint security review meeting in Anantnag, visits key areas | Major reshuffle in ACB J&K | From warzone to homeland: Kashmiri students hail India’s rescue mission with tricolour cheers | Security Forces bolster security with hi-tech gadgets | Token distribution for registration begins | Security Forces conduct joint mock drill | India woman footballer Soumya undergoes surgery after nasal bone fracture | Lack of variety in India's bowling attack is concerning: Chappell | National-level minor boxer alleges sexual harassment by woman coach | | MCM launches workshop on Skill Development, Entrepreneurship | GDC Kathua honours NCC Cadet Mohit Kanathia with grand welcome ceremony | Missing person traced from Pallanwala within 2 days | JKHCBAJ unveiles Portrait of Maharaja Hari Singh ji, inaugurated | Four JKAS Officers transferred In Transport Dept Reshuffle | J&K police arrest 87 in drug crackdown, seize narcotics worth Rs 2.42 Cr | Gross GST collections double in 5 years to record Rs 22.08 trillion in FY25 | Srinagar police attaches residential property worth Rs 50 lakh | SKUAST-K holds workshop in Gurez to promote revival of heritage crops | Reasi police solves two theft cases in Katra, accused arrested, stolen property | Union Minister Piyush Goyal to lead transformative FTII Traders conclave | Congress holds impressive Jai Hind Yatra in Poonch City, salutes armed forces, martyrs | Warm, affectionate farewell accorded to retirees of Agriculture Department Jammu | DC Shopian inspects work of rural development projects at Keller | Former JKNPP leaders, senior workers join Apni Party | Committee on Petitions holds meeting in Srinagar | 6000 students participate in NMMSS examination | Ladakh PM Vishwakarma artisans participate in MSME Day celebration | Vi Business’s ready for next - India’s largest digital advisory celebrates growth on MSME day | Indian Army pays tribute to Ex-Serviceman | Civil Defence, Jammu started 5 days CD training programme | Warm send off accorded to Sardar Dharminder Singh Bhargav Head Pharmacist from DHS-J | JKEDI concludes second batch of MDPs in 10 districts | Handicrafts, Handloom Deptt condoles demise of father of Mussrat Islam | IGNOU launches certificate programme for Nurse Managers to Strengthen Managerial Competencies in Nursing Services | Back Issues  
 
news details
HC quashes FIR against petitioner in alleged fake RBA certificate case
10/18/2022 11:30:28 PM

Early Times Report

Jammu, Oct 18: Justice Sanjay Dhar of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court quashed the FIR to the extent of petitioner (Indra Thakur) KAS in alleged Fake RBA Certificate.
The petitioner has challenged FIR No. 16/2015 for offence under Section 5(2) of the J&K Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 (for short ‘the Act of 2006’) registered with Police Station, Vigilance Organization, Jammu (Now, ACB Jammu).
Justice Sanjay Dhar after hearing Sr. Adv Sunil Sethi with Adv Sonika Thakur for the petitioner whereas AAG Raman Sharma for the ACB, observed that it is clear that dishonest intention is the gist of the offence under section 5(1) (d) of J&K Prevention of Corruption Act punishable under Section 5(2) of the said Act. Unless it is shown that a public servant has, by corrupt or illegal means, abused his position, it cannot be stated that he has committed the offence of criminal misconduct. In the instant case, the then Tehsildar concerned has, on the basis of a possible interpretation of the statutes and the rules, taken a view that the petitioner is entitled to grant of RBA certificate. Merely because another view relating to interpretation of these rules and statutes is possible, it cannot be stated that the then Tehsildar concerned has committed the offence of criminal misconduct while issuing the certificate in favour of the petitioner.
Justice Sanjay Dhar further observed that a bare perusal of Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the P.C.Act would reveal that a public servant can be prosecuted under that provision, only if he has abused his position as public servant and obtained for himself or for any other person any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage.
There is absolutely no whisper in Annexure-I F.I.R that the petitioner obtained any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by abusing his position as public servant. As noticed earlier, by virtue of the quasi judicial order passed by a public servant, if a party to the proceedings before the public servant had obtained any pecuniary advantage, it cannot be found that it was obtained by him as result of abuse of the official position of the public servant. The legislative intent is not to punish a public servant for any erroneous decision; but to punish him for corruption. Thus, to fall within the four corners of sub-clause (ii) of clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the P.C Act, the decision/conduct of the public servant must be dishonest amounting to corruption. Mens rea, the intention and/or knowledge of wrong doing, is an essential condition of the offence of criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the P.C.Act. The presumption under Section 20 of the P.C Act does not apply to the offence under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of that Act. it is clear that even if, it is assumed that the certificate in question has been issued in favour of the petitioner on the basis of a erroneous interpretation of relevant rules and the statutes, still then, in the absence of any dishonest motive or intention on the part of the issuing authority and in the absence of any material to show that the petitioner had connived with the competent authority, it cannot be stated that any offence is made out against the petitioner. In fact, the material on record shows that the petitioner has not concealed any relevant fact from the Competent Authority. It is not a case where the applicant has obtained the certificate by resorting to suppression of relevant facts. The competent authority on the basis of full disclosure regarding residence and financial status of father of the petitioner, issued the certificate in favour of the petitioner by following the view which is definitely a possible view relating to interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules. If at all the Competent Authority has taken an erroneous view, its order is subject to correction in appeal or revision in terms of the provisions contained in Sections 17 and 18 of the Act of 2004. But this erroneous decision in the absence of any material to show dishonest intention on the part of the Competent Authority cannot be made the basis of criminal prosecution against the petitioner. It is pertinent to mention here that there is nothing on record to suggest that the certificate in question has been cancelled by the appellate or revisional authority, which goes on to show that the same has been validly issued by the Competent Authority. Court further observed that the Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and ors vs Bajan Lal and ors, , has clearly laid down that extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution or inherent power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C can be exercised, either to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice in a case where the allegations made in the FIR, even if, they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused. The Court further observed that even in a case where allegations in the FIR and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR does not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officer under Section 156(1) of the Code, the Court can exercise its powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash the criminal proceedings.
The Court further observed that in the instant case as already noted, the contents of the impugned FIR and the material collected during verification of the case, do not disclose commission of any cognizable offence by the petitioner, as such, continuance of criminal proceedings against the petitioner would amount to abuse of process of law. With these observations, High Court allowed the petition and the impugned FIR to the extent of the petitioner is quashed. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not returned any finding as regards the validity of RBA certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. The issue has been examined only from the perspective whether or not offence of criminal misconduct is made out against the petitioner. JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU