news details |
|
|
| Jamaat aide keeps Kashmir pot boiling abroad | | |
Early Times Report
Jammu, Feb 6: Even as the Government of India has banned the Jamaat e Islami, its old aide and conduit abroad, Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai, has been trying to keep the pot of violence boiling in the Valley by observing the so called Kashmir Solidarity Day. New Delhi has taken a serious note of the developments.
Sources said the intelligence agencies have inputs that Fai, a resident of Kashmir, hiding in the United States of America for decades, held a panel discussion on the so called Kashmir Solidarity Day making provocative statements and hatching fresh conspiracies against the Indian nation.
Sources said the former Jamaat aide from Kashmir, who has also been under scanner for terror financing in the US held panel discussion that was sponsored by the Pakistani spy agency ISI.
The sources said Fai didn’t refrain from making provocative statements and hatching fresh conspiracies against India. The sources said the intelligence agencies have inputs that the panel discussion discussed several sinister designs against India.
It’s pertinent to mention that in 2011, Fai had pleaded guilty to secretly receiving millions of dollars from the Pakistan's spy agency in violation of US federal laws.
Fai, who was 62 then, was accused of working in Washington for the ISI to lobby for anti-national activities in Kashmir.
He was arrested and charged with failing to register as a foreign government agent. "For the last 20 years, Fai secretly took millions of dollars from Pakistani intelligence and lied about it to the US government," US Attorney Neil MacBride had said in statement that time.
Meanwhile the sources said New Delhi has taken a serious note of the development and is likely to pick up the matter with the US government.
“A person who has been found guilty of terror links even by the US government itself is again conspiring against India from the US soil. This is a serious issue and needs to be taken up accordingly,” said a senior official on the condition of anonymity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
