news details |
|
|
| Court rejects bail of JE in DA Case | | | Early Times Report
SRINAGAR, Nov 12: Special Judge Anti-corruption Kashmir RN Wattal rejected the bail application of Tariq Ahmad Ganie, JE Housing Board Unit, Bemina, Srinagar who was booked by Anti-corruption Kashmir in Disproportionate Assets case.
Police report reveals that on the basis of a source report received by ACB, Srinagar which disclosed that one Tariq Ahmad Ganie posted as JE in Housing Board has been making huge transactions in his various bank accounts and accordingly verification No. 44/2020 was ordered on 09.09.2020 into the allegations against the accused JE.
During the course of verification, it was revealed that Tariq Ahmad Ganie, JE Housing Board holds various accounts in different branches of J&K Bank in his own name. As per the salary statement provided by the Housing Board, the suspect JE has received a net payable amount of Rs 10,08,892 from 1st January 2018 to 30th September, 2020 which stands deposited in his salary account.
However, during the course of verification it was found that an amount of approximately Rs 3 crore 30 lakh have been deposited in six accounts of the JE through various transactions made in these accounts, which is ex-facie disproportionate to his income, received through salary. Verification conducted has also revealed that huge amounts have been deposited in the accounts of said JE through various transactions made by some contractors who have been executing works of the Housing Board, as allottees.
Special Judge Anti-corruption Kashmir RN Wattal while rejecting bail application observed that in recent times we are witnessing the plague of corruption affecting every department with certain exceptions.
The petitioner is one of such officials who in complete disregard to his official position though holding the important post of JE was having deceitful, despicable and corrupt intent to steal the public money amounting to crore of rupees and the immovable property at commercial locations.
A young engineer like the petitioner having accumulated the assets in very short span of time can never be taken in good taste by a common man who believes in honesty and whose main aim & object is nation building.
The case has assumed public importance and any concession of bail in favour of petitioner will be denounced by the society and faith of a common man on this esteemed institution may be eroded, same may encourage those who believe in resorting to corrupt practices to mint money.
On this count the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail, at this stage.
—JNF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
