news details |
|
|
| CBJ lodges FIR against father-son duo for cheating | | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Nov 18: Crime Branch Jammu (CBJ) registered a formal criminal case against a father-son duo for cheating the complainant and duping him of Rs 30 lakh over a piece of land (plot), falling in a prime Greater Kailash locality in Jammu city.
The accused Gandharab Singh, son of Amir Chand and his son Arjun Singh of Thangarpuli Channi Himmat induced the complainant to enter a deal of Rs 60 lakh as cost of the plot, out of which Rs 30 lakh was paid in advance after executing various 'agreements to sell' with regard to sale of said land over which they were having no ownership title, however on the basis of forged 'agreement to sell', they allured the complainant to handover a huge amount of Rs 30 lakh in the year 2017 to the accused.
A written complaint was received in Crime Branch, Jammu wherein complainant Krishan Lal, son of Amar Nath of Dhakki Bazar, Ward No. 7, Rajouri, at present Deeli Greater, Jammu, alleging therein that both the accused executed various 'agreements to sell' with regard to sale of land over which they were having no ownership title and on the basis of forged agreement to sell allured the complainant to handover a huge amount of Rs 30 lakh to them.
Accused Gandharab Singh is a notorious criminal involved in double murder case in FIR No 70/2001 U/S 302/RPC P/S Trikuta Nagar.
On receipt of instant complaint, a preliminary verification was conducted by Crime Branch, Jammu statement of witnesses and the record received from various banks and concerned Revenue office, it has been prima facie established that suspects Gandharab Singh and his son Arjun Singh with a malafide intention by impersonating himself as owner in possession of land measuring 10 marlas in Khasra No 635 situated at Deeli Greater Kailash Jammu through various agreements to sell and affidavits and allured the complainant dishonestly and executed a document through his son Arjun Singh with the intention to be believed by the complainant that Arjun Singh is the absolute owner in possession of land in contention and forged the affidavit and allured the complainant to deliver Rs 30 lakh to the involved accused persons for the land of which the suspect had no title. Thus, the accused persons caused huge loss to the complainant and subsequent gains to themselves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
