news details |
|
|
| Freedom of speech cannot be stretched to question status of part of country: HC | | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Apr 25: Justice Sanjay Dhar of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that questioning the fact of a state being a part of the Country by using the expression 'occupation of military or the people being slaves etc' doesn't come within the ambit of freedom of expression of an individual.
Justice Dhar said that the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under the constitution cannot be stretched to such a limit as to allow a person to question the status of a part of the country or its people. The court underscored that it is one thing to criticize the government for its negligence and express outrage on the violation of human rights of the people, "but it is quite another to advocate that the people of a particular part of the country are slaves of the government of India or that they are under occupation of armed forces of the country."
Justice Sanjay Dhar passed these observations while dismissing a plea of a lawyer, Muzamil Butt challenging FIR registered against him for uploading social media posts regarding a bomb blast at a gunfight site at Laroo village in Kulgam on October 21, 2018, during which six civilians were killed and more than 60 persons including men, women and children were injured.
The petitioner advocate, who is practicing at district court Kulgam for last 10 years, while terming the incident as "Karbala in Laroo" had wrote in a long thread "genocide and mayhem in my native hamlet Laroo. He had written in his English post, "For the first time in my life, I felt broken and weak and I could acknowledge that we are slaves and slaves have no life of their own."
In another post, the petitioner while commenting on Dr. Manan Wani said, "Manan's finger on trigger is more than the mechanism that sets off the firing action of a gun. It is not an isolated incident. It reflects the culmination of systemic failure. It reflects on those heartless structures that celebrate occupation of military bonhomie in cozy champagne circuits and page three parties of Gupkar."
After taking note of the posts uploaded by the petitioner, the Police Station, Kulgam booked him for offences punishable under Section 13 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (ULAP). The court noted that the petitioner, who happens to be an advocate, can very well understand the import of these expressions.
By making these comments, Justice Sanjay Dhar recorded, he is certainly advocating and supporting the claim that J&K is not a part of India and that it is occupied by Indian military with the people having being reduced to the status of slaves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
STOCK UPDATE |
|
|
 |
| BSE
Sensex |
 |
| NSE
Nifty |
|
|
| |
CRICKET UPDATE |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
