x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   LG regularizes non-teaching SMVDU employees | Embarrassment: Bihar woman retracts voter list claim made to Rahul, says she was told what to say | Kishtwar cloudburst: Death toll climbs to 64 | Sister confesses to killing sibling in Ganderbal’s ‘politicized’ minor’s murder case | CM Omar sanctions financial assistance for victims of Badhaal tragedy | ACD Doda reviews progress on developmental works, scheme implementation | Labour Deptt Srinagar conducts inspection of placement agencies | DC Kathua designates Model FPO under Central Scheme | Drones in Agriculture: Improving the Efficiency and Productivity | JU Green Campus Vision Must Walk Hand-in-Hand with Practicality | The Enduring Legacy of Yashwant Mehta’s Gujarati Literature | PMVBRY Goes Live | M K Yogi demands reopening of Martand Sun Temple, Mattan | Army Public School Damana hosts ‘Rendezvous with Our Alumni | DLTFC approves 45 JKREGP cases | Assistive devices distribution cum Fitment Camp held | Market inspection to check the quality of Food Safety Department in Poonch | Movable Property worth Rs 10 Lac attached by Udhampur Police | Secretary Shashanka Ala chairs review meeting | Kailash Kund Yatra curtailed to symbolic rituals in J-K's Doda | Devyani Rana Inaugurates ICICI Bank Branch in Dammi (Dansal Block) | Satish Sharma announces slew of activities on eve of National Sports Day | Mere recovery of drugs not proof of financing illicit traffic: HC | HC allows manual filing of chargesheets in J&K, Ladakh amid ICJS glitches | Northeast Frontier Railway powers ahead with major electrification milestone | We need to uplift Government schools for imparting quality education: CM Omar Abdullah | Gupta slams central Government's apathy towards Kishtwar calamity | BJP holds organizational meeting of District Budgam in Srinagar | Commissioner State Taxes chairs review meeting with STOs of Jammu division | Khelo India Water Sports Festival: J&K athletes eye national glory at Dal Lake | Yogi govt to deploy AI for transparent and error-free welfare schemes | GGM Science College felicitates students for winning laurels in Anti-Ragging Week competitions | Central University of Jammu holds patriotic letter-writing event | JKEDI conducts boot camps at Samba, Shopian, Baramulla | DC issues guidelines to ensure safe conduct of Kailash Yatra 2025 | DC Samba inspects development works, engages with community volunteers at Gurha Slathia | Pavitra Charri of Shree Chandi Maa leaves for Machail | Awareness programme on SIGMA portal and on the proper use of State Emblem of India | Syed Mohammad Altaf Bukhari greets new entrants into party fold | DC Poonch reviews progress of land acquisition for Govt projects | Director AHDJ inaugurates Introduction Training Programme | Back Issues  
 
news details
Sales tax not applicable on supply of goods
Setting up transmission lines, substations, power grids before 1997
5/4/2023 11:11:01 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, May 4: A Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Rajesh Sekhri has held that no sales tax is applicable for the supply of goods for erecting transmission lines, substations, and power grids.
The DB observed that the transaction between the assessee and the contractors in which the assessee has supplied the goods and material purchased by it from outside the State against C-Forms for the purpose of erecting transmission lines, sub-stations, and power grids for itself did not amount to "sale" as it was defined under Section 2(L) of the GST Act before 15.05.1997.
The assessee/appellant is a Government of India undertaking engaged in establishing its own grid stations and laying wires for the transmission of electricity. It is in the execution of its works, the assessee purchased some goods, materials, and machinery, etc. from outside the State. The assessee has taken registration under the Central Sales Tax, 1956.
The assessee first buys goods, material, and requisite machinery from outside the state and hands over the same to the contractors for consumption, fixation, and laying out in the works of the assessee.
As is claimed, the ownership and possession of the property used in the execution of the works of the assessee remains with it and the contractors are only engaged to execute the work on payment of labor charges.
The assessee submitted that since no property in goods is transferred to the contractors, as such, no payment against such material handed over to the contractors, to be used in the execution of works of the assessee, is charged.
Since the assessee was not making any local sales under the GST Act, as such, was not initially registered under the Act.
The Assessing Authority held that as the assessee had taken registration under the CST Act to import goods from outside the State against C-Forms, was, therefore, a "dealer". It was the plea taken by the Assessing Authority that only a dealer, who is registered as such under CST Act can use C-Forms to purchase goods for personal use. It was concluded by the Assessing Authority that the transactions made by the assessee were liable to tax. Consequently, the Assessing Authority also imposed interest and penalties under the GST Act.
The issue raised was whether the applicant has supplied the "goods" defined under the GST Act which shall be deemed to be a sale before 15.05.1997 under Section 2 (L) and is a dealer under the Act amenable to tax.
The DB further said that "We are sure that if the authorities under the GST Act lift the veil, they would certainly find that the two agreements styled as labour contract and supply contract are, in essence, a single composite contract to execute the works of the assessee by the contractor. If that exercise is done by the Authorities under the GST Act, the contractor, who has executed the works contract of the assessee, may fall in the GST net. In that eventuality, even the assessee, who is supposed to deduct the tax at source while making payments to the contractors could also be held liable. Be that as it may, with the aforesaid observations, we leave it to the Tax Authorities to act in the matter in an inappropriate manner," the court said.
The DB held that had the assessee followed this usual mechanism, it would have rendered the contractor liable to pay tax under the GST Act. To avoid the liability of the contractor, the assessee, in terms of a supply contract separately executed, purchased the goods and materials from the contractor from outside the State and delivered the same to the self-same contractor to be used in different works of the assessee. The court saw it as a shrewd move on the part of the assessee to defeat the provisions of the GST Act. —JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU