x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   Unrest in PoK | After 40 years, Srinagar Lok Sabha seat records above-average polling | Groom goes to vote in wedding attire | Kashmir’s first major polls after Art 370 abrogation | INDIA Bloc leaders scared of Pak’s nuclear power: PM Modi | Rahul Gandhi didn’t visit Ram Temple for fear of losing vote bank: Amit Shah | CBSE declares results: Over 93% clear class 10, 87.98% class 12 | Court grants 15 days judicial remand of ex-SSP, 6 ors | DG BRO calls on LG Sinha | CAT upholds state’s authority on job qualifications | Chairman JKBOSE reviews functioning of DIET Doda | Mother’s Day Celebration at Green Hill Academy Chinchora | Power shut down | YSS Deptt concludes 7-day refresher course for Physical Education Educators, Ground-men | DC discusses action plan with stakeholders to boost tourist facilities in Samba district | Dr Farooq Abdullah addresses election rally at Chowkibal | ECI establishes 119 special polling stations in Srinagar PC | Omar Abdullah asks people to reject forces who brought BJP to Kashmir | KPs flock to booths to vote for safe return to valley, more jobs | HC setS-aside conviction in corruption case against store-keeper | Cong holding PM Modi responsible for Nehru's mistakes: Jaishankar on China issue | 20 Delhi hospitals, IGI Airport, Northern Railways' CPRO office receive bomb threats | Ajatshatru Singh raises serious concern over escalating situation in PoJK | Adv Suresh Dogra, urges swift action on Raghunath Bazaar renovation under Jammu Smart City project | Crackdown on illegal mining, 4 vehicles detained by police | Beat booths maiden initiative of Jammu police, extending reach in rural areas | CEO, Yetindra continues second leg of Nubra valley tour for election preparation review | DDC assesses implementation of Holistic Agriculture Development Program in Kathua | Cyber Cell solves online financial fraud | People voted in large numbers in Srinagar Lok Sabha seat : Waheed Parra | DLTFC discusses BBBP action plan- 2024-25 at Ramban | CUJ organizes Shiksha Shastrarth on recent advancements in educational research | GDC Kishtwar hosts "A Day in the Life of a Deputy Collector" program | NCC Group Commander interacts with NCC cadets at GDC Samba | Bachpan play school Kathua celebrated Mother's Day | Inter school zonal level tournament/competition | Deeksha sets new Indian record | RCB have demonstrated ability to deliver when it counts: Moody | Praggnanandhaa beats Carlsen but remains third in Superbet chess | Div Com Jammu reviews arrangements for Shree Machail Mata Yatra 2024 | Poonch-Anantnag Constituency has made up its mind to elect Mian Altaf with big margin : Sadhotra | Farooq criticizing Modi to mask NC’s diminishing relevance: Kavinder | Representation of 3 NC MPs stand in Parliament poised to reshape destiny of J&K: Rattan Lal Gupta | Back Issues  
 
news details
Sales tax not applicable on supply of goods
Setting up transmission lines, substations, power grids before 1997
5/4/2023 11:11:01 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, May 4: A Division Bench of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Rajesh Sekhri has held that no sales tax is applicable for the supply of goods for erecting transmission lines, substations, and power grids.
The DB observed that the transaction between the assessee and the contractors in which the assessee has supplied the goods and material purchased by it from outside the State against C-Forms for the purpose of erecting transmission lines, sub-stations, and power grids for itself did not amount to "sale" as it was defined under Section 2(L) of the GST Act before 15.05.1997.
The assessee/appellant is a Government of India undertaking engaged in establishing its own grid stations and laying wires for the transmission of electricity. It is in the execution of its works, the assessee purchased some goods, materials, and machinery, etc. from outside the State. The assessee has taken registration under the Central Sales Tax, 1956.
The assessee first buys goods, material, and requisite machinery from outside the state and hands over the same to the contractors for consumption, fixation, and laying out in the works of the assessee.
As is claimed, the ownership and possession of the property used in the execution of the works of the assessee remains with it and the contractors are only engaged to execute the work on payment of labor charges.
The assessee submitted that since no property in goods is transferred to the contractors, as such, no payment against such material handed over to the contractors, to be used in the execution of works of the assessee, is charged.
Since the assessee was not making any local sales under the GST Act, as such, was not initially registered under the Act.
The Assessing Authority held that as the assessee had taken registration under the CST Act to import goods from outside the State against C-Forms, was, therefore, a "dealer". It was the plea taken by the Assessing Authority that only a dealer, who is registered as such under CST Act can use C-Forms to purchase goods for personal use. It was concluded by the Assessing Authority that the transactions made by the assessee were liable to tax. Consequently, the Assessing Authority also imposed interest and penalties under the GST Act.
The issue raised was whether the applicant has supplied the "goods" defined under the GST Act which shall be deemed to be a sale before 15.05.1997 under Section 2 (L) and is a dealer under the Act amenable to tax.
The DB further said that "We are sure that if the authorities under the GST Act lift the veil, they would certainly find that the two agreements styled as labour contract and supply contract are, in essence, a single composite contract to execute the works of the assessee by the contractor. If that exercise is done by the Authorities under the GST Act, the contractor, who has executed the works contract of the assessee, may fall in the GST net. In that eventuality, even the assessee, who is supposed to deduct the tax at source while making payments to the contractors could also be held liable. Be that as it may, with the aforesaid observations, we leave it to the Tax Authorities to act in the matter in an inappropriate manner," the court said.
The DB held that had the assessee followed this usual mechanism, it would have rendered the contractor liable to pay tax under the GST Act. To avoid the liability of the contractor, the assessee, in terms of a supply contract separately executed, purchased the goods and materials from the contractor from outside the State and delivered the same to the self-same contractor to be used in different works of the assessee. The court saw it as a shrewd move on the part of the assessee to defeat the provisions of the GST Act. —JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU