x

Like our Facebook Page

   
Early Times Newspaper Jammu, Leading Newspaper Jammu
 
Breaking News :   In the Shadows of Raja: “Bou Buttu Bhuta” Redefines Odia Cinema with Spectral Allegory of Rural Struggle | The role of the Anganwadi worker has evolved in tandem | Mental rabies means distance from humans, closeness with dogs | Today, Students must be Empowered to Choose not just what is “Safe,” | Sainik Sahayta Kendra | Under PM Modi’s leadership, J&K emerging as education, innovation hub: LG Sinha | Statehood to J&K: Cong mobilizing support of all 233 opposition Lok Sabha members to mount pressure | Kavinder Gupta assumes charge as Ladakh LG | ‘Want Ladakh to be recognised top tourism destination’ | DGP Prabhat reviews Bhadarwah security | CM Omar interacts with citizens at Raabita office in Srinagar | US designates LeT proxy TRF responsible for Pahalgam attack as terrorist organisation | Fresh batch of over 7,900 pilgrims leaves for holy cave shrine | Ahead of ‘Monsoon Session,’ Rajnath, Shah discuss ‘Operation Sindoor’ with NSA, tri-service chiefs | Truck hits car carrying Amarnath pilgrims, 8 injured | Man killed in Kathua accident | Traffic management committee | ACB arrests JDA official for accepting bribe | IT Deptt enables online utility for ITR-2 filing | CISF achieves record medal haul in 2024-25 | Jammu admin disburses Rs 24. 60 lakh compensation in 1 month | ZPHQ Jammu organises farewell ceremony | Janipur police nabs drug peddler wit 5 grams of heroin substance | Farooq hails Congress for taking up J&K statehood issue | CM Yogi's water conservation drive yields remarkable results in UP | DB upheld acquittal of KZF members | ADGP Armed felicitated DySP (Retd) Surjeet Choudhary | 75th anniversary of NSSO celebrated in Jammu | Dr Andrabi visits Eidgah Srinagar, meets youth delegations | Every disaster a lesson to learn from: CS | Doda police traced out missing lady and re-united with her family | Ramban police organized 'BHAROSA' awareness programmes | Improving infrastructure in lord Krishna's land is priority: Hema Malini | YRS will announce president after 23rd September celebration | APS Akhnoor hosts inspiring felicitation ceremony | Fake social media accounts being used to spark caste tensions, says CM Yogi Adityanath | Kathua police arrests absconder evading arrest | JKAACL organizes plantation campaign | The World Stands with Bharat, A Resounding Blow to Pakistan-Backed Terrorism: Gaurav | CS to kick start Vicharnag Temple renovation work today | NC workers join SBSP | Central University of Jammu organizes "Thursday Mind Meet" | Jammu police gifts selfie point to Akhnoor after national recognition | SKUAST-Jammu organizes ZREAC Kharif meeting | LPU inaugurates Real-World Tech Workplaces at Campus with Capgemini Code Experience Lab | DDC Kathua approves Rs 74.52 Cr District Capex Budget for FY 2025-26 | Bovine smuggling bid foiled by Doda police | First meeting of the 56th IFFI steering committee held in Mumbai | Inter-Nursing College Poster Competition held | Akhnnor Sports Club honours badminton players | India U-31 team wins bronze, U-16 finishes fourth in World Youth Team Bridge Championships | World Women's Chess Cup: All four Indians to play tie-breaks | Jadeja's "incredible fight" at Lord's Test earns him Team India's MVP tag | Free entry for Durand Cup at Jamshedpur | Didn't know that a national women's football team existed when I started out: Aditi Chauhan | Back Issues  
 
news details
Government servant cannot be discharged from service only on account of the pendency of a criminal case against him: CAT
6/21/2024 10:05:59 PM
Early Times Report
JAMMU, June 21: Central Administrative Tribunal holds that the service of a Government servant cannot be terminated or the Government servant cannot be discharged from service only on account of the pendency of a criminal case against him. The reason is obvious. Unless the guilt is proved, one is presumed to be innocent. Moreover, criminal case may be launched out of enmity etc. It is, therefore, the conviction and not the pendency of a criminal case which should be taken into account for disciplinary action."
This significant judgment has been passed by a Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal comprising B Anand Member (A) and Rajinder Singh Dogra Member (J) in a petition filed by Arsam Imtyaz Malik seeking setting aside Order No.CEJ/ADM/01 of 2024 dated 03-012024 issued by the respondent No.2 by virtue of which the appointment order issued in favour of the applicant under SRO 43 has been withdrawn that too without adhering to the principles of natural justice and also seeking direction to the respondents to allow the applicant to perform his duties at PWD (R&B) Division Bhaderwah pursuant to his appointment order dated 05-12-2023 and joining order dated 06-12- 2023."
The applicant is aggrieved of the Govt. Order No.CEJ/ADM/01 of 2024 dated 03-01-2024 issued by the respondent No.2 by virtue of which the appointment order issued in favour of the applicant under SRO 43 has been withdrawn that too without adhering to the principles of natural justice. The applicant came to be appointed under SRO 43 on account of death of his father by virtue of Order No.CEJ/ADM/232 of 2023 dated 22-11-2023 issued by the respondent No.2 in compliance to the approval conveyed by the administrative department. Pursuant to his appointment, the applicant came to be posted in PWD (R&B) Division, Bhaderwah for further duties by the respondent No.3 by virtue of Order No.CEC/Adm/05 of 2023 dated 05-12-2023 and accordingly the applicant joined in PWD (R&B) Division Bhaderwah on 06-122023.
The applicant at the time his appointment was made to swear an affidavit in which the applicant has sworn that he has not been convicted in any offence by any court of law and the applicant is facing trial in one case. It is only after swearing the aforementioned affidavit that the applicant was allowed to join and came to be posted in PWD (R&B) Division, Bhaderwah. On 23.12.2023, the respondent No. 4 addressed a communication bearing No. EE /PWD /R&B /BHD /2023-24/1055-56/8 in which it has been averred that the applicant has been allowed to join in the division after proper verification of the documents and on the receipt of character/antecedent certificate from CID issued by the SSP/Dy SP Headquarters for Special DG CID J&K vide Form No.55821 dated 17-05-2023 on 06-12-2023. It has further been averred that the affidavit sworn by the applicant reveals that he is under trail in one case and the said case is not disposed till date and accordingly the instructions were sought for the withdrawal of the salary of the applicant by the respondent No.4 from the respondent No.3.
CAT after hearing Adv Sheikh Najeeb for the applicant whereas Deputy AG Hunar Gupta for the UT, observed that the Rule(s) as mentioned hereinabove, nowhere provide pendency of a criminal case against a candidate to disqualify him for his entry into the service. The reason for this is obvious. Pendency of a criminal case cannot lead to the conclusion of committing the offence by the accused. Presumption is otherwise. No person is presumed to be guilty of an offence unless convicted by a competent Court after trial. It is also our common experience that trial of a criminal case consumes much time and ultimately the accused may be acquitted therein. Refusal of appointment on the ground of pendency of a criminal case would, therefore, result in miscarriage of justice to the candidate because even on his ultimate acquittal he cannot enter into service, CAT said.
CAT further observed that adverting to the facts of the instant case, it would be noticed that the applicant himself by virtue of an affidavit has disclosed the fact that an FIR has been registered against him bearing No.0087/2023 under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act of Police Station, Bhaderwah which is pending disposal in the court of Sub Judge, Bhaderwah.
CAT is of the considered view that mere registration of an FIR cannot be made the basis and equated with a finding of guilt recorded by a competent Court. In other words, registration of a case cannot lend the colour of conviction. The action of the respondent department in terminating the applicant would amount to holding the applicant guilty of the offence. Such a course of action would be totally unwarranted.
CAT held that the service of a Government servant cannot be terminated or the Government servant cannot be discharged from service only on account of the pendency of a criminal case against him. The reason is obvious. Unless the guilt is proved, one is presumed to be innocent. Moreover, criminal cases may be launched out of enmity etc. It is, therefore, the conviction and not the pendency of a criminal case which should be taken into account for disciplinary action."
In the facts and circumstances of the case, CAT is of the considered view that the respondents could not have straightway terminated the applicant without considering the relevant factors like the nature and gravity of the accusation because, in case, these allegations are subsequently found to be false or not proved in the trial, resulting in acquittal, the same would cause undue hardship to the applicant, as the applicant would then be appointed only after getting clearance during investigation and trial and would be offered appointment subsequently occurring vacancies for no fault on his part, which may take several years if not decades.
CAT further observed that as stated earlier, the applicant has not been terminated on the ground that his character is such which makes him unsuitable for the service. Neither it is the case of the respondents nor there is any adverse report against the applicant of this nature after verification of his antecedents. Hence, CAT is of the definite view that the applicant has wrongly been terminated merely on the ground of pendency of FIR against him.
Termination here is in violation of principles of natural justice as before resorting to termination a reasonable opportunity to show cause had not been accorded to the applicant. Natural justice is implicit in rules and has to be read as part and parcel thereof, if not specifically provided, as held by the Apex Court in J.A. Naiksatam v. Prothonotary Senior Master.
With these observations CAT allowed the petition and impugned Order No.CEJ/ADM/01 of 2024 dated 03-01-2024 issued by the respondent No.2 by virtue of which the appointment order issued in favour of the applicant under SRO 43 has been withdrawn, is hereby set aside. Respondents are directed to allow the applicant to perform his duties at PWD (R&B) Division Bhaderwah pursuant to his appointment order dated 05.12.2023 and joining order dated 06.12.2023.
CAT further said that on conclusion of the criminal trial, law shall take its own course, and the appointment offered to the applicant may be withdrawn / terminated. —JNF
  Share This News with Your Friends on Social Network  
  Comment on this Story  
 
 
 
Early Times Android App
STOCK UPDATE
  
BSE Sensex
NSE Nifty
 
CRICKET UPDATE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Home About Us Top Stories Local News National News Sports News Opinion Editorial ET Cetra Advertise with Us ET E-paper
 
 
J&K RELATED WEBSITES
J&K Govt. Official website
Jammu Kashmir Tourism
JKTDC
Mata Vaishnodevi Shrine Board
Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board
Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Board
UTILITY
Train Enquiry
IRCTC
Matavaishnodevi
BSNL
Jammu Kashmir Bank
State Bank of India
PUBLIC INTEREST
Passport Department
Income Tax Department
JK CAMPA
JK GAD
IT Education
Web Site Design Services
EDUCATION
Jammu University
Jammu University Results
JKBOSE
Kashmir University
IGNOU Jammu Center
SMVDU