news details |
|
|
| Protest of KAS aspirants enters 7th day | | |  Early Times Report
Jammu, Dec 11: Aggrieved aspirants who are on a prolong protest and agitation for the last 7 days challenging the mass error/scam in the recently declared JKPSC, KAS 2016 Mains exam result today organised a mass level protest at Jammu University.
Aspirants alleged that the Jammu And Kashmir Public Service Commission while declaring the result of KAS Mains 2016 exam on 4th of December 2018 has ousted many deserving and meritorious candidates.
Terming the statement of Chairman of the Commission that the commission has adopted the methodology of Digital Checking, Aspirants alleged that Digital checking procedure is full of errors and many deserving candidates despite performing well in their papers are not in the list candidates shortlisted for interviews.
The agitated candidates alleged that how Commission can arbitrarily adopt the methodology of Digital Checking and that too mid way of the examination where as UPSC doesn't adopt a similar approach. The aspirants alleged that it's already a proven fact in various judgments across high Courts and Supreme Court that there are high chances of error if the papers are evaluated digitally.
A KAS Aspirant among the protesting agitators cited the example of Orissa High Court whereby in a Judgement in a case challenging the Digital Marking in CBSE-NEET exam, High Court remarked that the methodology of Digital Checking can never be absolute and there are high chances of variations and machinery error.
"A total of 8200 candidates appeared in the KAS Mains examination dated 2nd July 2016. Around 65,600 Answer scripts were evaluated via digital checking", said one of the aspirants.
The candidates further alleged that without any expertise, infrastructure, resources and R&D how JKPSC can claim that their methodology of Digital Checking is without any error.
The aggrieved candidates have demanded an immediate Judicial inquiry into this matter and also stated that they are even ready to give in written that if proven wrong then commission can debarred them from any future exams. But on the contrary they have demanded that if the Commission is at fault then all the officials should resign on the basis of accountability and credibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
