news details |
|
|
| BJP leaders looting tax payers’ money in collusion with corrupt officers in J&K: Harsh Dev | | |  Early Times Report
Jammu, Mar 22: Referring to the illegal occupation of Estates mansions and Ministerial bunglows by BJP leaders besides retention of govt vehicles by them without any entitlement, Harsh Dev Singh JKNPP Chairman and former Minister accused the politician-officer nexus of looting the state’s resources and public exchequer in J&K.
He said that despite the Assembly having dissolved in 2018 and Ministers and MLAs having ceased to exist, it was shocking to note the continued encroachment of public properties by the Ex-legislators of BJP without any lawful authority due to the shelter provided to them by the corrupt bureaucrats of J&K.
Not only were the said BJP leaders unlawful encroachers but even the High Court too had directed repeatedly for their eviction with recovery of penal rent from them for the period they overstayed in the said premises.
The J&K bureaucrats however had allowed the said leaders to continue to hold possession of the said public premises in their desperation to keep the BJP and JKAP leaders in good humour. It was further shocking to note that JK Apni Party had been recently allotted Estates bunglow at Gandhi Nagar for its political office while other top opposition leaders were thrown out of the govt quarters despite militant threats and security related issues faced by them. He was addressing a press conference in Jammu today.
Not only the Estates Bungalows but the security vehicles and PSOs were also being allotted purely on political considerations, said Mr. Singh. He pointed out that all the Ex-MLAs and Ex-Ministers of BJP and JKAP were provided security vehicles and a huge paraphernalia of security personnel while denying bare minimum security to opposition leaders. He said that even top leadership of recognized political parties has also been divested of their due security by withdrawing their escorts, vehicles as well as security PSOs despite facing militants’ threats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
