news details |
|
|
| ET gets access to charge-sheet filed against Ex AAG, other accused | | Ex AAG guilty of making fictitious documents to get Rs 3 Cr worth insurance cover | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Oct 18: Early Times has got the access to the charge sheet which was produced by the Crime Branch Srinagar in the much publicized case in which Ex Additional Advocate General Of JK High Court Peer Showkat Hussain Naqashbandi and other accused. They have been charged with making fake and fictitious documents in order to get the insurance claim.
As per the details available with Early Times, the case owes its origin when the EX Additional Advocate General Peer Showkat Hussain Naqashbandi appointed during the PDP regime and the co accused in league with each other conspired in the year 2004 wherein they stated that the truck they were travelling in it met with an accident at Batote and accused persons accordingly lodged an FIR at Police station batote under section 279 RPC but the concerned S. H. O Batote said in the report that there is no truth in the allegations levelled by the accused persons and on receipt of the communication of the S.H.O batote ,PHQ has issued an order vide no. 85/2002 dated 28.02.2002 that the FIR NO. 47/2001 U/S 279 RPC,P/S batote be re- opened for further investigation and subsequently transferred it to the crime branch Srinagar for further investigation.
Further investigations into the matter revealed that the complainant namely Peer Showkat Hussain Naqashbandi Advocate and Ex Additional Advocate General hatched a criminal conspiracy with other associates by projecting a fictitious story in order to get the insurance claims from the Insurance companies. In furtherance of said criminal conspiracy the accused Peer Showket Hussain Naqashbandi Advocate prepared fake and fictitious insurance claims and bills from bilal Goods Carrier Magarmal Bagh Srinagar, in order to get the undue benefits of claiming insurance amounting to crores of rupees against the Non existing marine items .Accordingly a separate case FIR NO. 74) 2004 U/S 420, 468, 471, 120-B, 511 RPC was registered at P/S CBK in this connection.
"These above said accused persons who are total six in number and they without any fear of law and one of them who was Ex Additional Advocate General played fraud and cheated the insurance company in furtherance of their criminal intention".
During the course of investigations it has come to fore that even 33 insurance policies of individuals were seized from the New india insurance company and United insurance company ltd by the crime branch Srinagar and the perusal of the same revealed sixteen policies were in the name of different persons and 17 policies is of Kashmir Arts (Marine items) under different names amounting to 03 crores of rupees have been effected from the New india insurance company Ltd on the basis of false information as well as fake and fictitious documents provided by the accused persons to the insurance companies giving them the belief that the documents produced are genuine".
Aggrieved of the no case made out by the Police of batote and closure of the Investigation,the Additional Advocate General then moved a complaint before the consumer commission and the Consumer Commission after heard both the parties pleased enough to direct the crime branch Srinagar to investigate this matter.
Sources privy to this instant case divulged that during the PDP regime this accused no. 2 in the Charge sheet who is EX Additional Advocate General and he was appointed to this coveted post due to the blessings of the PDP adding, the time when he holds this post of Additional Advocate General during the tenure of the PDP, he makes merry and calls the shots.
"What is more intriguing and baffling aspect is that the criminal case is pending against him and he was Additional Advocate General in the High Court at that relevant point of time " Sources regretted adding, but the PDP Government did not bothered to check his antecedents and he did whatever he wanted meaning there by that he resorted to illegal ways to amassed wealth and use his influence that to managed the illegal work from the concerned officials of the department concerned"they rued.
Elaborating further, they said "One can imagine the criminal intention of this Accused person Ex Additional Advocate General who without any fear of the law made the fictitious documents to get the insurance claims for the reason he knew that being the Additional Advocate General he can trample the law and use the influence to get the insurance to the tune of 3 crores by managed the fictitious accident of the truck bearing JKQ 1147 at chanderkote in batote area and the Ex Additional Advocate General thought that by using the influence of his position he can become successful in his nefarious designs along with others co accused but the Crime branch on the directions of the Honble court after doing investigation in a fair and impartial manner coupled with the help of Concrete evidence comes to a conclusion that the Accused persons in league with one another hatched a conspiracy to make fictitious documents to get insurance claims by showing that the truck in question was laden with Marine items as such the accused persons are booked under Section 420,468,471,120- B RPC and 511 RPC of P/S Crime branch Kashmir.
The investigation conducted and evidence on record revealed that the accused persons (S.No.1 to 6) Peer Manzoor Hussain Naqashbandi S/0 Peer Abdul Rashid R/O Zirhama Kupwara presently Vidhata Nagar Bhatindi Jammu, Peer Showket Hussain Naqashbandi (Advocate)Ex Additional Advocate General during the PDP regime S/O Peer Abdul Rashid R/O Zirhama Kupwara presently Qamarabad Bemina Srinagar, Syed Showket Saleem Andrabi S/O Gh. Rasool R/O Ratnipora Pulwama, Mushtaq Ahmad Khawja S/O Mohammad Hussain R/O Zirhama Kupwara, Mohammad Rafi deedad/Rafiq khan S/O Jumma Khan R/O Dudu Marhama and Mukhtar Ahmad Khan S/O Gh. Jeelani R/O Dudu Marhama Sangam deceased in league with each other under a conspired plan prepared fictitious documents and projected a fictitious story in order to get the insurance claims from the insurance companies as such committed offences U/S 420,468,471 , 120-B , 511 RPC.
Starting revelations revealed that the challan in this case was produced in the Month of 24.8.2021 in which Crime Branch proved the case against high profile persons, but surprisingly the Crime branch which otherwise in every case issued the press notes to a respective dailies newspapers so that the functioning of the crime branch came to know to the Government in particular and Public in general but here in it is irony! that the Crime branch Srinagar did not issued the press note to the Newspapers of both Jammu and Srinagar- raising many doubts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
STOCK UPDATE |
|
|
 |
| BSE
Sensex |
 |
| NSE
Nifty |
|
|
| |
CRICKET UPDATE |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
