news details |
|
|
| Internet could be used to propagate modern terrorism: J&K govt to SC | | | Early Times Report
Jammu, Apr 29: The Government of Jammu & Kashmir has filed its reply to the plea seeking restoration of 4G internet connectivity in the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir as directed by the Top Court vide order dated April 9.
Formulating a consolidated reply to similar/ identical petitions filed for the common prayer of restoration of 4G, it has been averred that since the Government Order of March 26 which had extended restrictions on connectivity to April 3 “no longer exists”, the petitions filed therto, assailing the G.O. are rendered infructuous.
Further, the petitioner states that as a “sequel” to the G.O. had already been issued on April 3 as well, the interlocutory Application which challenged the aforementioned order is therefore infructuous.
Stating that the contentions of “alleged deprivation of access to education, health care facilities/updates” are incorrect as the administration of J&K is “taking all possible steps to ensure minimum impact of COVID19 is felt”.
The Government has answered in its preliminary submissions that it is wary of the “constitutional” & “statutory oblidations”, in light of which it has been exercising powers under relevant statutes vis-à-vis The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885′ and ‘The Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services(Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules, 2017 (2017 Rules).
“The orders issued, which are placed in public domain, are not only in consonance with the statutory mandate but also in conformity with the directions/guidelines laid down by this Hon’ble Court while imposing restrictions inter-alia, on mobile data/internet services” the reply states.
Apropos this, the answering respondent, i.e. the Government of J&K submit that under Rule 2(6) of the 2017 Rules, the “misuse/abuse of exercise of power under such orders imposing restrictions” are reviewed within seven working days and due consideration is accorded to concerned stakeholders.
“It is ensured that the restriction on access to internet is commensurate to the gravity of situation and accords with provisions of section 5 of the Telegraph Act” the Government avers in its reply.
The reply goes on to justify the rationale of the imposition of restrictions in J&K. Government has averred that while enunciating restrictions, various aspects such as “public safety and interest” as well as the “principle of proportionality” , “extent of reasonibility of restriction”, “available alternatives” and “incitement to any offence /security/sovereignty and integrity of India” are considered.
Law & order, internal security, circulation of inflammatory material, prevention of losses to human life, geographical proximity with Pakitan, among other things, have been emphasised by the Government in order to justify the imposition of restrictions.
“It is pertinent to mention that the prayers prayed for by the petitioners and the present affidavit needs to be appreciated in light of the fat that since 1990, 41866 persons have lost their lives in 71038 incidents throughout the erstwhile State of J&K.
This includes 14038 civilians, 5292 personnel of security forces and 22536 terrorists. These figures depict the nuances and emphasis the unavoidable requirement of reasonable restrictions given the very peculiar geo-political position of Jammu & Kashmir and its geographical proximity with Pakistan”
Stating that the “Right to Access the internet is not a fundamental right” the reply elucidates that it can be curtailed if other Fundamental Rights are effectuated by access to internet such as Freedom of Speech & Expression or Right to Carry out business or trade in abrogation of the “sovereignty” & “security” & “integrity” of India, it lawfully warrants curtailment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
