news details |
|
|
| Court rejects bail of farduster duped Rs 1.30 crore | | | Early Times Report
JAMMU, Feb 24: 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu Rajinder Sapru rejected the bail application of one Fiyaz Ahmed Rather who duped 1.30 crores from innocent student for the PG course in Medical.
According to the Crime Branch petitioner assured complainant in the case for arranging admission of his son in MD Course at ASCOMS Sidhra for the sessions 2016 for which he demanded an amount of Rs. 1,30,00000; that complainant paid said amount to petitioner; that petitioner failed to fulfil his promise and thereby cheated complainant with dishonest, malafide and fraudulent intention; that petitioner resultantly, is involved in FIR No. 10 of 2021 for offences under sections 420/120-B RPC; that offences committed by petitioner are anti-social, heinous and non-bailable in nature; that petitioner is also involved in another FIR No. 18 of 2020 for offence under section 420 IPC registered with Police Station Kothi Bagh, Srinagar having the same pattern of duping people; that investigation of the case is at preliminary stage and release of petitioner on bail at this stage would impede the same; that grant of bail to petitioner will encourage him to re-indulge in similar activities etc.
2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu Rajinder Sapru after hearing APP DP Singh for the Crime Branch whereas Adv Amjad Khan for the applicant observed that modus operandi adopted by the applicant/accused, the fact that he has indulged it similar crime after being granted bail in a case based on identical facts earlier and that many other people have already started approaching the investigating agency with similar allegation against the applicant/accused, this Court is of the considered opinion that right of personal liberty of the applicant/accused has to yield to the larger interests of the society, as there is every chance that if applicant/accused is given the concession, he will repeat the similar crimes again and may even try to influence and intimidate the witnesses who allegedly have started approaching the investigating agency with their grievances against the applicant/accused, to save himself. With these observations Court rejected the bail application.
—JNF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
STOCK UPDATE |
|
|
 |
| BSE
Sensex |
 |
| NSE
Nifty |
|
|
| |
CRICKET UPDATE |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
