news details |
|
|
| PDP contests Sheikh Nazir's claim on 1975 Indira-Sheikh Accord | | | EARLY TIMES REPORT
Srinagar, Dec 8: Rubbishing the claim made by the National Conference general secretary that the late Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah was not a party to the 1975 Indira-Sheikh Accord, opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) today alleged that denial of their actions was nothing new for the house of Abdullahs.
In a statement the party chief spokesperson Naeem Akhtar said, "Such backtracking came naturally to NC leadership as they thrived only in the grey space of Kashmir politics while the people of the state suffered as a result of their acts of omission and commission."
He said it is inconceivable that the Accord could have been only a handiwork of the late Mohammad Afzal Beg without participation of Sheikh "though its only objective was installing Sheikh as chief minister and making way for his successors to the throne."
Sheikh Nazir had claimed in an interview to a local daily that "Sheikh was not directly involved in the 1975 exercise. It was Mirza Mohammad Afzal Beg and G Parthasarthy who were talking to each other." Akhtar said the virtual disowning of 1975 accord by the Abdullah family as some kind of an underhand act of the late Beg "was yet another specimen of betrayal of a close associate of the late Sheikh but that was not its only import."
"This is an attempt at rewriting history to divert attention from the latest phase of NC seeking salvation and survival as an appendage of congress which obviously raises questions about its claims to a regional character," he said. The PDP leader said denying a historical fact was nothing new for the NC as the party denied even having been a party to accession after enjoying power without elections for five years raising the banner of plebiscite. He alleged that though during its rule between 1947 and 1953 the NC leadership let loose a reign of terror, exiling and imprisoning opponents on charges of being Pakistani agents and 'arresting' radio sets, the NC leadership made a volte face and misled people in the name of plebiscite. "The 1975 Accord was another U turn through which NC secured power once again without elections and accepted all the erosion in state's autonomous character. Not only this, the NC leadership even gave away the right to make changes in the nomenclature of the governor and chief minister under state constitution in July 1975, only five months after the accord," Akhtar said. He said NC had to make a choice between power and pursuing the autonomy resolution passed by the state assembly and "it did not bat an eyelid in making its choice."
"Now that the party has declared it's janam janam ka saath with the Congress that holds 1975 Accord as the most sacrosanct agreement on Kashmir, denying Sheikh Abdullah's participation in it is an act of such duplicity and brazenness that can be practiced only by a party like the NC," Akhtar added. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
