news details |
|
|
| Talks & terror cannot co-exist India has conveyed this to Pak | | | India has conveyed to Pakistan that New Delhi was ready to normalise relations between the two neighbours provided Islamabad ends export of terror. This has been conveyed to Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan, who has, in his tweet, congratulated Modi for retaining power. Modi has politely conveyed to Khan that terror and talks cannot co-exist. Either Pakistan has to stop export of terror or be ready for facing Balakote type strikes. Imran Khan and Modi may meet during Shanghai cooperation organisation meet in Kyrigstan next month. And his foreign minister, Kasauri, too is for development of peaceful relations but India wants terror to end which may reopen the doors of dialogue. Both India and Pakistan are committed to promote peace which is in its interests of people of Pakistan and India.
And New Delhi has placed only one condition and that is to end export of terror. Modi and Imran Khan are set to meet in a third country and this time Modi has not invited Imran Khan to his swearing in ceremony indicating that Prime Minister of India is annoyed with Pakistan because it has not conceded one demand for ending export of terror which is mandatory for the resumption if bilateral dialogue for promotion of peace and friendly relations. Pakistan has seen the superiority of Indian Army and the success of Modi for another term is unwanted for Islamabad because for the first time Modi has proved a tough guy for Pakistan.
That is the reason for Pakistan's offer for developing cordial relations between New Delhi and Islamabad and India wants to promote cordial ties with Pakistan. Both Islamabad and New Delhi know that bitter relations breed tension and when the two nations are nuclear powers war is no option. Let people in India and Pakistan live in peace that is the ideology of Modi. Though Modi is outwardly tough guy but inwardly he is against war and consequent destruction. May be some other country, either the US or Russia, may bring the two nations closer so that there is no danger of war. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
